Chapter 18 · Verse 49·Spoken by Krishna
असक्तबुद्धिः सर्वत्र जितात्मा विगतस्पृहः।नैष्कर्म्यसिद्धिं परमां संन्यासेनाधिगच्छति
asakta-buddhiḥ sarvatra jitātmā vigata-spṛihaḥ naiṣhkarmya-siddhiṁ paramāṁ sannyāsenādhigachchhati
One whose discernment is unattached to everything, who has mastered the self and is free of longing, attains through renunciation the supreme perfection: the state beyond all action.
Word by Word
Saved for this reading session
Three movements · tap a label to switch
Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda
Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur
Synthesis · a glossed leaf
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
rishna sketches the inner person who is ready for the highest goal by naming three traits. First, asakta-buddhi: an understanding that is unattached everywhere, with no clinging fastened to son, wife, house, body, or the fruit of any action. Second, jitatma: a self that is conquered, meaning the mind and inner organ are brought under control and no longer pulled outward by sense objects. Third, vigata-spriha: longing departed, so that even the thirst for the body, for life, and for enjoyment is gone. The commentators stress that these are not loose synonyms but a careful sequence. Unattachment names the absence of clinging to outer things; self-conquest names the inner calm that holds even when attachment is gone; and absence of longing names the drying-up of craving down to its root, the body itself.
Braided from 11 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
Such a person attains naishkarmya-siddhi, the supreme perfection, through sannyasa, renunciation. The commentators are nearly unanimous that naishkarmya here does not mean simply stopping all movement or refusing to act. It is the state in which action no longer binds. As several put it, what is renounced is not the deed but the doership and the grasping for fruit. When the sense of being the agent and the hunger for results fall away, the activities the senses still perform among their objects no longer stick to the person; one becomes free even while acting.
Braided from 6 commentators
Vedānta Deśika · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas · Rāmānujācārya
This perfection is called supreme, parama, because it stands above the lower, action-born success spoken of earlier in the chapter. The commentators distinguish two levels. There is the success that comes from doing one's own work well as worship, which purifies the inner organ; and there is this higher perfection, which is the standing in knowledge of the actionless self, or the fitness for the direct realization of Brahman. The first prepares the ground; the second is the consummation that the first makes possible. The verse marks the doorway between them.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrīdhara Svāmī
The three named traits are also presented as a needed qualification, not optional ornament. Several commentators read the verse as a warning: renunciation by itself does not deliver the perfection. Only one already unattached, self-conquered, and free of longing reaches it by renunciation; one not so equipped does not gain it by the mere outward act of giving up. The inner readiness must come first, and for some the prior path is precisely steadiness in one's own action, which ripens these traits.
Śrī Puruṣottama · Swami Ramsukhdas · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
These commentators read naishkarmya-siddhi as the consummation that is actionlessness itself, the standing in knowledge of the actionless Brahman as one's own self. The renunciation meant is the formal giving up of all action, for the knower alone; one source describes it concretely as relinquishing all action together with the outer marks such as the tuft and the sacred thread, followed by inquiry into the Vedanta sentences. On this reading the verse describes the qualified seeker of liberation who, his impurity worn away by doing his own duty, now turns from action altogether to abide as the actionless self, and so reaches the supreme success that has the form of immediate liberation, far beyond the success born of action.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
Viśiṣṭādvaita
Here the absence of longing for one's own agency comes from dwelling on the supreme Person as the true agent: one is freed of the craving to be the doer by resting the doership in God. Renunciation is determined to be nothing other than relinquishment of fruit, the very fruit-renunciation that has been the chapter's theme, not the cessation of action. What is reached is the supreme standing in meditation, the discipline of knowledge about to be taught, which takes the form of the senses ceasing their outward action; the inner non-attachment gives the action a non-binding character.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
These commentators deliberately refuse to read naishkarmya-siddhi as liberation. To equate it with liberation, they argue, would clash with the following verse, which speaks of thereafter entering the Lord; if this verse already named final release, that sequel would have nothing left to give. So they gloss it instead as the perfection of yoga whose aim and fruit is actionlessness, a perfection belonging to yoga, distinct from and preparatory to the liberation that comes after.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Śuddhādvaita
One reading in this school braids the verse's three clauses into the three paths gathered as one inward act: the unattached intellect is the Sankhya portion, the conquered and longing-free self is the heart of Yoga, and freedom from longing for anything other than the Lord is bhakti. By this single inward act sannyasa yields the supreme perfection. The other reading stresses that one must renounce one's own action oneself rather than wait for it to demand renunciation, and underlines that the named traits are required: without them, mere renunciation does not win the perfection, which comes only through steadiness in the action itself.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhakti
One commentator answers a precise objection here: how, when work is still performed, can only its merit-part accrue with the fault-part stripped away? The answer is that for the unattached, ahamkara-free, craving-free person, the work itself becomes naishkarmya because the bent of agency has fallen, yet the present sannyasa points beyond even this to the supreme perfection, the paramahamsa state of mentally renouncing all actions and sitting at ease. Another renders the whole movement as a long contemplative drama: attachment loosening like a ripe fruit from its stem, the intellect recoiling from sense objects into the solitude of the heart, past karma spent like a stored water supply running dry, the grace of the preceptor killing the last subtle ignorance so that the triad of action, agent, and instrument dissolves, leaving only actionless sentience, the highest of all perfections like the finial atop a temple.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Sant Jñāneśvar
Modern
One modern voice insists the verse proves that release won by abandoning action is equally won by those who perform their worldly duties with a desireless heart; the merchant or even the butcher, acting unattached with a peaceful mind that has realized the underlying unity, is as entitled to release as the Brahmin at his rites, for naishkarmya does not require dropping action. Another reads it through the destruction of ignorance: the knowledge of the Self burns the fruit-bearing effects of action, so one may still act for the welfare of the world yet remain unbound, resting as the actionless Self in immediate liberation. A third makes the qualification practical and non-sectarian: jitatma is keeping the body under one's own control rather than being led by it into sloth and heedlessness, and naishkarmya is the dropping of doership and the hunger for fruit, the freedom-while-acting reached by the sankhya-yogi.
Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
If naishkarmya means freedom from action, why do the commentators keep saying I can reach it while still working, and what exactly am I supposed to give up?
The word naishkarmya does not mean stopping the body from moving. The commentators are clear that it names the state in which action no longer binds the person. What you give up is not the deed but the doership, the inner claim I am the agent, and the phala-iccha, the grasping for results. When those two fall away, the activities the senses still perform among their objects no longer adhere, and you are free even while acting.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Vedānta Deśika
This is why the verse front-loads the inner conditions: unattached understanding, a conquered self, departed longing. Several commentators warn that the outward act of renunciation alone does not deliver the perfection; only the person already so equipped reaches it. The readiness is the real work, and for some it ripens precisely through steady, desireless performance of your own duty rather than through fleeing it.
Śrī Puruṣottama · Swami Ramsukhdas · Lokmanya Tilak
So the apparent contradiction dissolves. One who has truly let go of agency and craving has already attained naishkarmya in the midst of work; this is why the merchant or warrior who acts unattached is held to be as entitled to release as the renunciant. Where the schools differ is only on how far this verse reaches: some read it as the standing in self-knowledge that is liberation itself, others as the yoga whose fruit is actionlessness and which prepares the liberation named in the verse that follows.
Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Contemplation
Take the three traits as a checklist for your own inner life, not as a far-off ideal. Watch where your understanding is soaked in attachment: a place, a time, a circumstance, a thing, a person, an activity. That clinging is the asakti to loosen. Notice how the body leads you into sloth and heedlessness, and quietly take it back under your own control rather than letting it run you. And watch for spriha, the grasping wish, and let it fall. Then comes the heart of the practice: naishkarmya is not the dropping of action, it is the dropping of the sense that you are the doer and the hunger for the result. You do not have to abandon your work to be free. Drop the doership and the fruit-grasping, and the very actions your senses perform stop sticking to you. You become free even in the middle of acting.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.