Chapter 18 · Verse 41·Spoken by Krishna
ब्राह्मणक्षत्रियविशां शूद्राणां च परंतप।कर्माणि प्रविभक्तानि स्वभावप्रभवैर्गुणैः
brāhmaṇa-kṣhatriya-viśhāṁ śhūdrāṇāṁ cha parantapa karmāṇi pravibhaktāni svabhāva-prabhavair guṇaiḥ
The duties of the Brahmanas, the Kshatriyas, the Vaishyas, and the Shudras are divided according to the qualities born of their own nature.
Word by Word
Saved for this reading session
Three movements · tap a label to switch
Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda
Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur
Synthesis · a glossed leaf
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
rishna says that the actions, the karmas or prescribed duties, of brahmins, kshatriyas, vaishyas, and shudras have been apportioned, set apart from one another, by the qualities (gunas) born of their own nature (svabhava). The key word is pravibhakta, distributed or divided with care: the four kinds of work are not a random heap but a clearly graded sorting. Every commentator reads the verse this way. The duties belong to the doers because of an inner cause, the mix of gunas in each, and not as labels pinned on from the outside.
Braided from 14 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
The three twice-born orders (brahmin, kshatriya, vaishya) are named together in one compound, while shudras are named separately. The commentators agree on why: the first three share consecration and so share the right to study the Veda and perform Vedic rites, while the shudra, being one-born and lacking that investiture, does not have that scriptural eligibility (adhikara). So the grouping in the verse already tells us something: the line between the three and the fourth is drawn by Vedic qualification, not by mere status.
Braided from 7 commentators
Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Swami Ramsukhdas · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda
The word svabhava, one's own nature, is unpacked in two ways, and several commentators give both as live alternatives rather than choosing. First, svabhava is the Lord's prakriti, his maya made of the three gunas; the gunas spring from that and are therefore 'born of nature.' Second, svabhava is the impression (samskara or vasana) laid down by actions done in earlier births, which becomes manifest in the present birth as turned toward its own effect; the gunas have that conditioning for their occasioning cause. Either way the point holds: the gunas do not arise without a cause, and svabhava names that cause, so the work that flows from a person flows from something deep and real in him.
Braided from 8 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas · Vallabhācārya
Most commentators give the same guna-to-varna mapping. The brahmin's nature springs from sattva, and so he is calm. The kshatriya's nature springs from rajas with sattva subordinate, and so he is of lordly disposition. The vaishya's nature springs from rajas with tamas subordinate, and so he is of enterprising, money-earning disposition. The shudra's nature springs from tamas with rajas subordinate, and so he is suited to service. The disposition is read straight from observable marks: calm, lordliness, enterprise, dullness. The duties then follow the gunas in conformity with the kind of person each guna-mix makes.
Braided from 7 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Vallabhācārya · Sant Jñāneśvar
Several commentators set this verse at the opening of the closing section of the Gita and explain its purpose. After the earlier chapters described the whole round of birth as three-guna-natured and (in chapter fifteen) called for cutting the samsara-tree with the sword of non-attachment, a doubt arises: if everything, agent, action, and fruit, is made of the gunas, how can anyone be released? The answer this section begins to give is that by doing the duty enjoined for one's own station, with worship of the supreme Lord and the knowledge that comes by his grace, the gunas (being of the nature of ignorance) cease, and release comes. So this verse does not merely classify society; it starts the Gita's final teaching on how the bound person works his way free.
Braided from 6 commentators
Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrī Puruṣottama · Vallabhācārya
Divergence
Viśiṣṭādvaita
This reading keeps the order brahmin-then-shudra as a scale of descending sattva but maps the lower three orders differently from the common scheme. The brahmin's nature-sprung quality is sattva, risen by overpowering rajas and tamas. The kshatriya's is rajas, risen by overpowering sattva and tamas. The vaishya's is tamas slightly risen, by overpowering sattva and rajas. The shudra's is tamas exceedingly risen, by overpowering rajas and sattva. Here svabhava is specifically the earlier karma that causes birth as a brahmin and the rest, and the scriptures are what set forth, distinguishing, that these are their qualities, these their actions, and these their ways of life.
Rāmānujācārya
Advaita Vedānta
This school presses an objection and answers it. Scripture itself enjoins calm and the rest on brahmins and the others, so how can these duties be said to be apportioned by the gunas? The answer: there is no conflict, because scripture too assigns these duties only with regard to the particular gunas a person has, never apart from them. The man's nature is a co-operating factor for the very words of scripture that convey the meaning. So the verse and scripture name the same division from two sides: scripture states it, the gunas ground it. Nilakantha pushes this furthest, arguing from the Mahabharata and Manu that the marks (calm, truth, forbearance, non-cruelty, and so on) define the brahmin wherever they appear, even in one born a shudra, and their absence makes a born brahmin a shudra; varna is read off inner quality, not birth alone, like a bird flying by its own nature and not by mere kind.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha
Śuddhādvaita
This reading folds svabhava into the Lord's own will. Svabhava is the bhava that is the Lord's, his own desire to be seen in many ways as sattvic and so forth; from this the natures arise, and by these natures the actions are distributed in a clearly graded way. So the division of work is not just a fact about persons but an expression of the supreme Person's intention to manifest himself in graded forms. Even the exceptions to the usual mapping have their cause in former action.
Śrī Puruṣottama · Vallabhācārya
Kashmir Shaivism
This reading turns the verse directly on Arjuna as an argument that he cannot escape acting. Everyone is determined by his own nature; even if for a while that nature is veiled by some defect, when the veiler departs the person regains his nature now come to manifestation. The setting-out of the division of action for the orders necessarily does not overstep its bounds. So for Arjuna, whose own-nature is that of a kshatriya, prakriti called his own-nature will take up the office of compeller without fail, even against his wish. The deeper point is the way out: for one merely compelled there is connection with merit and demerit, but if he acts with the clear knowledge Krishna has declared, there is no binding connection with action, and bondage ceases.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
A Seeker Asks
Does this verse make caste a fixed accident of birth, or is it really saying that one's true order is set by the inner qualities a person actually displays?
The verse's own emphasis is on inner cause, not external label. The duties are pravibhakta, apportioned, by the gunas born of svabhava; they belong to a person because of the mix of sattva, rajas, and tamas in him, read off from observable marks like calm, lordliness, enterprise, and dullness. The division tracks what a person is inwardly, not a tag assigned from outside.
Śaṅkarācārya · Swami Ramsukhdas · Vedānta Deśika · Swami Sivananda
One strand of commentary takes this very far: wherever the brahmin's marks (truth, forbearance, non-cruelty, calm, and the rest) are seen, even in one born a shudra, that person is to be known as a brahmin, and where those marks are absent in a born brahmin, he is a shudra. On this reading the marks of quality, not birth, settle the matter, and scripture is cited to support it.
Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha
Still, svabhava itself is explained as the impression carried from earlier births now manifest in this one, so birth and inner nature are not treated as simply unrelated; the earlier karma is said to be the very cause of being born in one order rather than another. The practical takeaway the commentators draw is to stop measuring oneself by status (abhimana), find the work one's actual nature makes natural, and do it without craving for fruit as worship of the Lord, which is how the gunas are finally outgrown.
Rāmānujācārya · Swami Ramsukhdas · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
Contemplation
Take this verse as a mirror for your own work rather than a chart of social rank. The varnas, this guidance says, are not labels fastened on from outside; they are apportioned by the gunas that spring from your svabhava, your inborn disposition shaped by the samskaras of countless past actions. So do not look at your station with pride or self-image (abhimana). Look instead at your actual nature, notice the kind of work it throws up spontaneously, and do that work as worship of the supreme. To know the duty your own nature makes natural to you, and to perform it without attraction and aversion (raga-dvesha) and without craving for its fruit, is to live your varna inwardly rather than merely wearing its name.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.