Chapter 2 · Verse 24·Spoken by Krishna
अच्छेद्योऽयमदाह्योऽयमक्लेद्योऽशोष्य एव च। नित्यः सर्वगतः स्थाणुरचलोऽयं सनातनः
achchhedyo ’yam adāhyo ’yam akledyo ’śhoṣhya eva cha nityaḥ sarva-gataḥ sthāṇur achalo ’yaṁ sanātanaḥ
The Self cannot be cut, burned, wetted, or dried. It is eternal, all-pervading, stable, unmoving, and ancient.
Word by Word
Saved for this reading session
Three movements · tap a label to switch
Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda
Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur
Synthesis · a glossed leaf
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
his verse explains WHY the four assaults of the previous verse fail. The Self (here the indwelling Self, the dehi or sharirin, the one seated in the body) is uncuttable (achchhedya), so weapons cannot cut it; unburnable (adahya), so fire cannot burn it; unwettable (akledya), so water cannot wet it; and undryable (ashoshya), so wind cannot dry it. The point is not that no sword or fire is present, or that the wielder is too weak. The point is that the act of cutting, burning, wetting, or drying simply cannot 'enter' the Self at all: it has no fitness, no suitability, for being acted on in these ways. Several commentators ground this in what the Self IS: being partless and without fluidity and formless, it offers nothing for these operations to grip.
Braided from 10 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrī Ānandagiri · Dhanapati Sūri · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
The second line gives the deeper reason in a chain of linked qualities. Because the Self is eternal (nitya), free of any beginning or end, it cannot be newly produced. Because it is all-pervading (sarva-gata), it cannot be reached or attained like a place one travels to. Because it is fixed and stable (sthanu), holding its own nature without lapsing into any other form, it cannot be modified like milk turning to curd. Because it is unmoving (achala), it is not acted upon. So it is sanatana, age-old, never freshly produced from any cause. Several Advaita readers present this as a tight inferential ladder: eternal, therefore all-pervading; all-pervading, therefore fixed; fixed, therefore unmoving; therefore ancient.
Braided from 9 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Swami Sivananda · Śrī Puruṣottama · Vallabhācārya · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
Read closely, the positive epithets together rule out every kind of change that could ever befall a thing. Some commentators name four kinds of 'action-fruit' that an object can undergo: being produced (utpatti), being attained (apti), being modified (vikara), and being refined or perfected (samskara). The Self is none of these. 'Eternal' bars production, 'all-pervading' bars attainment, 'fixed' bars modification, and 'unmoving' bars refinement. Because a thing can be the object of an action only when one of these fruits is in play, and the Self admits none of them, the Self is not a possible object of any action whatsoever. This is why no weapon, fire, water, or wind, and indeed nothing at all, can touch it.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
The commentators anticipate and answer the obvious charge that this verse merely repeats what 2.20 and 2.23 already said. Their reply is unanimous in spirit: the repetition is deliberate and not a flaw. Because the reality of the Self is extraordinarily hard to grasp, hidden from ordinary understanding, the Lord raises the same truth again and again, in fresh words and from fresh angles, hoping it will finally land in the mind of one still caught in the round of birth and death. The images are vivid. As a householder pounds rice grain by grain to strip the husk, so the truth of the Self must be driven in by repeated hearing until it strikes home; and as in this age the threefold cry 'there is dharma, there is dharma' breeds firm conviction, so repetition here breeds doubt-free certainty.
Braided from 6 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
The Advaita readers take 'all-pervading' in its full, literal sense: the Self is spatially omnipresent, like space (akasha), with no boundary of place. They support this with scripture: 'all-pervading like ether and eternal,' 'one, motionless like a tree, it stands in heaven,' 'partless, actionless, at peace.' Several add a sharp argument: whatever can be modified is limited, and whatever is limited is not all-pervading; since this Self is all-pervading it cannot be modified, and being unmodifiable it is eternal. One commentator anticipates the objection that atoms too are called eternal yet are not all-pervading, and sets it aside on the ground that atoms are not established by valid evidence at all. A further refinement: although such omnipresence and changelessness most naturally describe the supreme (tat), this verse is teaching the disciple's own inmost Self (the 'tvam' of 'tat tvam asi'), and the identity of the two is real only when all distinction of ruler and ruled is dropped, two pure consciousnesses with nothing between them. On this reading the weapons cannot cut the Self because the Self is its very inner controller, that which gives weapons their being and their light; how could what lends them existence become the object of their work?
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrī Ānandagiri
Dvaita
The Dvaita reading insists that 'eternal, all-pervading' and the rest belong, in the first place, to the Lord, and to the individual soul only derivatively. The soul is the Lord's reflection (pratibimba), and a faithful reflection shares, where nothing forbids it, the properties of its original; so the soul is unfit for cutting and the rest because the Lord whose reflection it is, possessing eternality and all-pervasion, is unfit for them. This 'reflection' is carefully distinguished from the rival accounts that make the reflection wholly identical with, or wholly different from, the original; here the soul is genuinely different from the Lord, and that very Lord-dependent likeness of an utterly distinct soul is what scripture calls the soul's being His 'portion' (amsha), as 'a portion, because of the statement of difference' and 'my very portion in the world of souls' teach. These commentators also resist reading the Self's 'unmovingness' as denial of all activity: it denies only worldly, samsaric action, for activity is genuinely seen in the Lord, 'austerity is My very heart, learning My body, action My form.' Much of this source is given over to establishing, against any claim of the soul's oneness with the Lord or the supremacy of other deities, that the single great purport of all scripture is the supremacy of the qualities of the Supreme Lord, who alone is unmade by maya and whose power depends on nothing else.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Bhakti
The Gaudiya readers take 'all-pervading' (sarva-gata) NOT as spatial omnipresence but as the soul's going, by the force of its own karma (svakarma), in turn to all kinds of bodies, of gods, men, animals, birds, and the rest. The all-pervasion is a pervasion-by-transmigration, the soul reaching every type of embodiment according to its deeds, not a filling of all space. On 'imperishable,' one commentator warns against gilding the word into 'that whose property is non-destruction,' since the plain word already gives that; the meaning is simply that the soul's non-destructions are eternal. These readers also link the present epithets forward: because the Self is exceedingly subtle it is 'unmanifest,' because it is nonetheless conscious throughout the body it is 'inconceivable,' and because it is free of the six transformations beginning with birth it is 'unchangeable.' (A third Bhakti voice keeps to the shared frame, deriving uncuttability and the rest from partlessness, formlessness, and absence of fluidity, and compressing the verse into a single argument from the incompatibility of these properties with the four assaults.)
Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrīdhara Svāmī
Modern
Ramsukhdas, a non-sectarian devotional Vedanta voice, presses the qualities into a practical and exhaustive form. The Self cannot be cut, burned, wetted, or dried not only by weapons, fire, water, and wind, but by mantras, curses, medicines, and any power at all; he illustrates with cases where a curse cut off a head or burned a man to ashes, and where a raga wetted stone or moonlight wetted a gem, yet none of these touches the dehi, in which the very act cannot enter. He then walks the second-line epithets as an imagined dialogue that closes off every loophole: 'eternal' (it always is), then perhaps it sits in one place ('all-pervading,' it is seated in all beings in one form), then perhaps it comes and goes ('unmoving,' no coming and going), then perhaps it merely trembles in place like a tree ('fixed,' no trembling), then perhaps it was at least once born ('sanatana,' beginningless, from ever). His summing purport: against the world, which is fleeting and unstable even for a moment, these five epithets point to the dehi who abides without interval, one-tasted and of one form, even while one is still identified with body and world.
Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
Why does the Gita keep repeating that the Self cannot be harmed instead of saying it once and moving on?
Because the reality of the Self is genuinely hard to grasp, hidden from the ordinary mind that knows only changing things. The commentators are explicit that the Lord raises the same truth again and again, in fresh words and from fresh angles, precisely so that a truth this elusive might finally come within reach of someone still caught in the round of birth and death. The repetition is a teaching method, not a stammer.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Swami Sivananda
The repetitions are also not flatly identical. Each pass adds something the earlier one lacked and that is useful right here: the second line of this very verse supplies positive epithets, eternal, all-pervading, fixed, unmoving, ancient, that together rule out every kind of change a thing could undergo, where the earlier statement had mainly denied birth and death. So the seeming repetition is really a deepening.
Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrīla Baladeva
And repetition is how conviction is actually formed. As a householder pounds rice grain by grain until the husk falls away, the truth of the Self has to be impressed by repeated hearing until it strikes home; as the threefold cry 'there is dharma, there is dharma' breeds a doubt-free 'there is indeed dharma,' so hearing this truth again and again breeds firm certainty in a mind that would otherwise keep wavering.
Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīla Viśvanātha
Contemplation
When fear of harm rises, take the five words of this verse as five pointers and let each one quietly close a door. Eternal: this in me always is; there was never a time it was not, never a time it will not be. All-pervading: it is not penned into one spot but seated in every being in one form. Unmoving: it does not come and go, drifting here and there. Fixed: it does not so much as tremble in place, the way a rooted tree still sways. Sanatana: it was never once born, it is from ever. Notice that the world around you, and the body you call yours, is fleeting, not stable even for a moment, while this points steadily to the dehi who abides without interval, one-tasted, of one form. The striking encouragement here is that this remains true even while you are still identified with body and world, even before you can clearly tell the dweller apart from the dwelling. The abiding One does not wait on your realization to be safe. Resting attention there, again and again, is how the fear loosens.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.