Chapter 3 · Verse 15·Spoken by Krishna
कर्म ब्रह्मोद्भवं विद्धि ब्रह्माक्षरसमुद्भवम्। तस्मात्सर्वगतं ब्रह्म नित्यं यज्ञे प्रतिष्ठितम्
karma brahmodbhavaṁ viddhi brahmākṣhara-samudbhavam tasmāt sarva-gataṁ brahma nityaṁ yajñe pratiṣhṭhitam
Know that action arises from Brahman, and Brahman arises from the Imperishable. So the all-pervading Brahman is forever established in sacrifice.
Word by Word
Saved for this reading session
Three movements · tap a label to switch
Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda
Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur
Synthesis · a glossed leaf
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
he verse traces action back through a chain to its ultimate ground. Most commentators read the chain like this: action (karma) arises from Brahman, Brahman in turn arises from the Imperishable (akshara), and so action is finally rooted in that Imperishable. The point is not idle metaphysics. By showing that action has a source higher than human whim, Krishna gives the working person a reason to keep working: your action is not a private matter, it is woven into the order of things from the very top.
Braided from 18 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
On the most widely held reading, the word 'Brahman' here means the Veda, the scripture that prescribes and reveals action. Action is called 'Brahman-born' because the Veda is what discloses which actions to do, above all the sacrificial rites; the Veda is the revealer and authority for action. This is why Krishna can speak of action as having a sacred origin: it is not that everything trivially arises from Brahman, but that right action is made known by the Veda.
Braided from 12 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda
Several commentators stress that the Veda, in turn, arises from the Imperishable, the supreme Self, effortlessly, the way breath issues from a person. They cite the same scripture: 'of this great Being, the Rig-veda, Yajur-veda, Sama-veda and Atharva-hymns are the out-breathing.' This origin matters because it secures the Veda's authority. Since the Veda is not the composition of any fallible human mind but issues directly and naturally from the supreme Self, it is free of error, incapacity and the wish to deceive, and so is a trustworthy means of knowledge in matters the senses cannot reach. This is what sets the Veda apart from merely human or heterodox scripture.
Braided from 8 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda
Because Brahman is all-pervading (sarva-gata), yet is said to be 'ever established in sacrifice' (nityam yajne pratishthitam), the commentators resolve the apparent puzzle of how something everywhere can be fixed in one place. The dominant answer is that the Veda's chief content and purport is the prescription of sacrifice, so although it pervades all (illumining everything, present in all mantras and texts), its central intent rests on sacrifice. A second strand holds that Brahman is 'established in sacrifice' in the sense that it is reached or attained through sacrifice as the means. Either way, the verse drives toward a practical conclusion: sacrifice is central, so one should perform one's prescribed work as sacrifice.
Braided from 14 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
These commentators read 'Brahman' as the Veda and 'Imperishable' (akshara) as the supreme Self. Action is Veda-revealed; the Veda is the breath of the supreme Self and so an infallible, impersonal (non-human-authored) means of knowledge for supersensible matters like dharma. The whole point of the chain is to ground the authority of the Veda and thus of the sacrificial duty it enjoins, and to urge abandoning the false dharma of heterodox texts in favor of Veda-taught dharma. 'All-pervading yet established in sacrifice' is explained by the Veda's chief content being the rules of sacrifice; one of them adds that the eternity of the Veda and the ubiquity of sound are shown here.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
Viśiṣṭādvaita
These commentators take 'Brahman' here not as the Veda but as the body, which is a transformation of matter (prakriti). They support this by reading the word 'Brahman' as standing for matter elsewhere, as in 'My womb is the great Brahman.' So 'action arises from Brahman' means action arises from the body. 'Brahman arises from the Imperishable' then means the body, the instrument of action, arises from (depends on) the individual self (akshara = jiva), since the body, ensouled and sustained by food and drink, gains the power to act. The all-pervading 'Brahman' (the body present in every embodied being) is 'rooted in sacrifice.' One of them works through the apparent circularity carefully, supplying scriptural support for calling matter 'Brahman' and the self 'akshara,' and closes that this holds for the path of action and the path of knowledge alike.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
These commentators insist on the primary, literal senses of the words against any figurative reading. 'Arising' should mean real birth, not 'being made manifest'; and 'Brahman' should mean the supreme Brahman, not the Veda. So action genuinely arises from the supreme Brahman, since insentient things have no activity of their own and even the individual soul, being a dependent reflection of the Lord, acts only as preceded by the Lord's activity (agency is denied to the soul in 'it is not the agent'). The 'akshara' (imperishable syllables) are the eternal letters, from which the supreme Brahman is made manifest, since otherwise the beginningless, full, inconceivable Brahman could not be known. They mount a long defense of the Veda's eternity and against the Veda being authored: 'out-breathing' means effortlessness, not production without thought, since creation is always preceded by the Lord's desire. Brahman, being made manifest through the chain by sacrifice, is therefore eternally established in sacrifice.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Bhedabheda
This commentator reads 'Brahman' as the Veda (action is revealed by it) and 'Imperishable' as a name of the supreme Self, citing the same out-breathing scripture, so that the all-pervading Brahman is named the Imperishable. The entry breaks off before completing its account, so only this first stretch of the reading is available; one of the Dvaita commentators notes that an objection was directed against this Bhedabheda position.
Śrī Bhāskara
Śuddhādvaita
These commentators read 'Brahman' as the Veda (or as Prajapati, also called 'Brahman' in accord with the doctrine of Brahman), arising from the Imperishable. But the distinctive note is that sacrifice is not a mere instrument standing apart from the Lord; it is the Lord's own manifest body. Drawing on 'the Person alone is all this' and 'sacrifice indeed is Vishnu,' the limbs of the Person are seen as the very materials of the sacrifice, so sacrifice is not different from Brahman; it was first made by Prajapati and taught to others, and so Brahman stands established in sacrifice. The aim is to bring out the supremacy of the supreme Person: the Imperishable is of the very form of the feet of Purushottama, and sacrifice points directly back to the supreme. One adds that for him the equation of sacrifice, Hari and Brahman closes the case.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhakti
These commentators read 'Brahman' as the Veda and 'Imperishable' as the supreme Brahman, leaning on the out-breathing scripture. The action in question is specifically the operations of the sacrificer and the priests, born of hearing the Veda's injunctions. Their emphasis falls on attainment: because the all-pervading Brahman is established in sacrifice, Brahman itself is reached or attained by sacrifice as the means. One illustrates 'established in sacrifice' with the saying that Lakshmi ever stands in effort. One adds that, although a whole chain of effect and cause has been laid out (from food up to Brahman), among them it is sacrifice alone that scripture enjoins as a thing to be done, so sacrifice alone is the matter under discussion, and cites the recollected text on oblation reaching the sun, rain, food and creatures.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva
Modern
Following the Vishishtadvaita reading rather than the Veda-reading, this commentator takes 'Brahman' here to mean Prakriti, the fundamental substance of the world, which has sprung from the Paramesvara (the Imperishable); therefore the all-pervading Brahman is always primarily worshipped in sacrifice. He explicitly judges the 'Brahman = Veda' reading inferior here, on the ground that it cannot make sense of 'the all-pervading Brahman is in the sacrifice,' whereas reading Brahman as Prakriti (the world being nothing but Prakriti, all activity springing from the three-strand Prakriti) fits, and matches the Mahabharata line that the world follows sacrifice and sacrifice follows the world, and the Purusha-sukta account of the gods creating the world by first performing a sacrifice.
Lokmanya Tilak
Modern
These commentators keep the Veda-reading and turn it into lived ethical orientation. One states plainly that 'Brahman' may mean the Veda, the Veda is the breath of the Imperishable (the Omniscient), and it ever rests in sacrifice because it deals chiefly with sacrifices and their performance. The other draws out the practical force: since action's source is the Veda and its ultimate root is the imperishable Paramatma, action in its very root rests upon Paramatma, and to act in this knowledge is to lift action out of private appetite altogether; sacrifice here is no narrow ritual but the very ordering by which the all-pervading Brahman holds the world, so to do one's duty as sacrifice is to align with the order of the Imperishable.
Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
The schools read 'Brahman' so differently here (the Veda, the body or matter, or the supreme Brahman taken literally) that I wonder whether the verse has a settled teaching at all, or whether the disagreement changes what I am being asked to do.
Notice first that the schools agree on the shape of the verse even where they differ on the labels: action is traced up a chain to an imperishable ground, and the chain lands, practically, on sacrifice. Whether 'Brahman' is read as the Veda that reveals action, as the body that performs it, or as the supreme Brahman from which action truly springs, every reading ends at the same place, that the all-pervading reality is established in sacrifice.
Braided from 10 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Vallabhācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
So the disagreement is mostly about how high up the chain the word 'Brahman' is pointing, not about what you are asked to do. The most widely held reading is that 'Brahman' means the Veda, the scripture that reveals which action to do, and that the Veda in turn arises effortlessly from the supreme Self, which is why it carries authority. That gives a clear ground for action: do what the Veda makes known, above all the sacrificial duty.
Braided from 8 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda
The competing readings deepen rather than overturn that practical point. One school reads 'Brahman' as the body or matter to stress that even your acting body is dependent, sustained and ensouled, not self-standing. Another insists on the literal supreme Brahman to stress that no insentient thing and not even the soul acts on its own, all activity being preceded by the Lord. A devotional school reads sacrifice as the Lord's own manifest body, not a mere tool. Each is making the same move from a different angle: your action is not finally your private possession, so the fitting response is to offer it as sacrifice.
Braided from 6 commentators
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
For practice, then, you lose nothing by holding the converging conclusion: act as the order revealed to you prescribes, and do that action as sacrifice rather than for private gain, knowing its source and root lie higher than yourself. That much every school here supports, whatever the term 'Brahman' is taken to name.
Braided from 7 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
Contemplation
Take this verse into your ordinary working day. The teaching is that your action does not begin and end with you: its source is the order revealed in scripture, and its ultimate root is the imperishable Paramatma. So before you act, remember where the action comes from and where it finally rests. When you do your duty in that awareness, as an offering rather than as the pursuit of private appetite, you lift the action out of the small world of personal wanting and place it inside the very order by which the all-pervading reality holds the world together. Understood this way, sacrifice is no narrow ritual; doing your own work as sacrifice is simply aligning yourself with that larger order, so that even daily labor becomes a way of keeping step with the Imperishable.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.