Chapter 5 · Verse 14·Spoken by Krishna
न कर्तृत्वं न कर्माणि लोकस्य सृजति प्रभुः। न कर्मफलसंयोगं स्वभावस्तु प्रवर्तते
na kartṛitvaṁ na karmāṇi lokasya sṛijati prabhuḥ na karma-phala-saṅyogaṁ svabhāvas tu pravartate
The Self creates no sense of doership for the world, and no actions, and no link with the fruits of action. It is nature that runs its course.
Word by Word
Saved for this reading session
Three movements · tap a label to switch
Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda
Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur
Synthesis · a glossed leaf
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
he verse states three denials and one affirmation, and almost every commentator reads them in the same order. The Lord (prabhu) does not create doership (kartritva), the sense that 'I am the one who acts'. The Lord does not create the actions themselves, the things people want and make. And the Lord does not create the joining of an action to its fruit, the link by which a deed brings pleasure or pain back to the doer. What actually drives all of this is svabhava, one's own nature. So the verse is denying that the true Self, or God, is the source of the whole machinery of acting and reaping. The commentators read these three denials as a tight set: not the prompter who says 'act', not the doer of the deed, and not the one who hands out the fruit.
Braided from 17 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Madhvācārya · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
Several commentators draw out the three denials as a denial of three distinct roles. By denying doership the Lord is shown not to be the prompter, the one who commands 'do this'. By denying the actions the Lord is shown not to be the actual doer of the deed. And by denying the action-fruit link the Lord is shown to be neither the one who causes enjoyment nor the enjoyer himself. So the verse clears the Self of being instigator, doer, and enjoyer all at once. The Self illumines and owns the body, the senses and the rest, but it does not push them into motion.
Braided from 6 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha
The fourth quarter of the verse answers the obvious question: if the Self does nothing, then who or what makes everything go? The answer is svabhava, 'one's own nature'. The commentators agree the verse traces all acting back to this nature rather than to the Self. They unpack svabhava as something belonging to the world of matter and not to the pure Self: it is what carries on its own working, beginninglessly, and the Self only seems to act because it is associated with this nature. So the point is not that nothing happens, but that the source of the happening lies in nature, not in the Self.
Braided from 13 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak
A number of commentators use this verse to defend God against a serious charge. Scripture itself says the same One makes a person do good action whom He wishes to lift up, and makes a person do bad action whom He wishes to cast down. If God directly authored every good and bad deed, He would be guilty of partiality and cruelty, favoring some and condemning others. These commentators read 5.14 as Krishna's reply: God does not manufacture doership in the living being. He regulates an already-running tendency of beginningless ignorance and desire; the unevenness rests with that ignorance, not with God. So God is the regulator of a process already in motion, not its first author, and the charge of cruelty falls away.
Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Swami Ramsukhdas
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
These commentators identify svabhava, 'one's own nature', with maya, the beginningless nescience or ignorance that throws up the whole appearance of acting. The Self of itself neither acts nor causes action; what engages is Nature marked by ignorance, the divine maya that Krishna will name later in the Gita as 'this divine maya of Mine'. This maya is distinct from the mere primal matter (pradhana) of other systems, because it is called maya precisely to mark that it is non-knowledge. One source presses that there is no real connection at all between Self and non-Self, comparing them to iron and a magnet: the Self illumines like the sun, by whose mere rising lotuses open and water-lilies close, yet the sun impels nothing; so when the Self shines, people act and pots stay still, but the Self is neither impeller nor restrainer of anyone. In the highest truth the agency, the actions and the fruit are like dirt that seems to be in the sky but is not really there at all.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha
Viśiṣṭādvaita
Here svabhava is the 'impress of matter', the prakriti-svabhava, the proper working-form of matter, and it is real, not an illusion. The world moves about in the forms of god, animal, human and unmoving thing through its contact with matter. The agency, the actions and the fruit are made by the conceit of self that a person forms toward this and that bodily form, a conceit produced by contact with matter and set going by earlier and earlier action from beginningless time. None of this is prompted by the Self's own essential nature. One source is careful to add that the Self does not stop being the locus of awareness; the point is only that agency and its fruit do not, in the proper sense, belong to it. The Self is to be discriminated from the changes it appears to undergo when joined to matter.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
These commentators read the verse against the background that the living being is impelled by the Supreme Lord. The living being does not really act, because it is a master only over insentient things, never independently. While doing and causing things to be done, in truth it does not do or cause anything by its own independence, since it is moved by the Supreme Lord. One source notes that the word 'prabhu', Lord, could not apply to the individual soul at all, so it points to the all-pervading Supreme Lord; this reading nearly establishes the Lord's all-pervadingness. The denial of agency thus guards the knower from being reduced to falsity: he genuinely is, but he is not the independent doer.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Śuddhādvaita
These commentators link the verse to the need for self-restraint: only by restraining the self in evenness is everything accomplished, while the conceit of doership produces only false conduct. The Lord does not create for the embodied soul, who wrongly takes itself to be its matter-bound body, either doership or actions or the action-fruit union; it is one's own nature, set in motion by matter, that does so. One source draws the deeper Pushtimarga note: the supreme Person does not become the doer in the soul's place, nor does He merely watch; He is the cause of the whole working of matter, and the soul's freedom comes by knowing that doership lies in matter while the refuge lies in Him. Another source frames the verse as removing a worry about teaching: if the Lord does not create agency, action or fruit, why would He even teach in such a manipulating way? The svabhava of the individual soul, in the form of its own matter, sets itself in motion as agency and the rest.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhakti
These commentators read svabhava as the living being's own beginningless ignorance (avidya), which operates so as to mount the false conceit of agency onto the soul. The Lord, the master of the body and senses, neither commands 'do this', nor is Himself the doer, nor joins anyone to pleasure and pain as fruit; rather the soul's own nature, under the long sway of beginningless ignorance and desire, has become inclined to go forth into action. One source insists the Lord is the regulator of this already-running tendency, not its first manufacturer, so the unevenness rests with ignorance and not with Him. The Marathi source paints the Lord as without activity yet the author of everything in the vast universe: His hands and feet are never sullied by actions, His repose is never disturbed, He is the very life of the universe and yet is controlled by no one, and has not even the awareness that the universe is ever created or ends. One source adds a subtle qualification that even in the pure soul there is some measure of agency, to be understood as belonging to perceiving and the like, since action is simply the meaning of the verbal root.
Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Sant Jñāneśvar
Kashmir Shaivism
This commentator extends the verse from the individual self to the Blessed Lord. The self does nothing for anyone; its engagement is its mere nature, not a desire for fruit. For the Lord, whose self is consciousness and whose true nature is the freedom that is light and bliss, the whole sequence of creation, maintenance and dissolution is drawn out by His mere nature, with never the slightest falling-away from His own nature. So there is no doer-state and no agency that is anything additional to Him. And once there is no real doership, what are the actions? In their unreality, whose is the fruit, and what is the action-fruit link? Just as the turning of the potter's staff and wheel is nothing apart from consciousness, and the pot does not complete that activity because the whole thing lies within consciousness, so the conscious, independent supreme Lord alone shines forth in this way and that, and there is no activity or fruit apart from Him.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Bhedabheda
This commentator reads the verse as describing the liberated, perfected one, who is spoken of 'as if' he were an ordinary creature only because ordinary beings have a dependent circle of son, servant, wife and the like to govern. The liberated one does not ordain duties for any dependent circle, because the relation of dependent and master has ceased for him. Nor does he create a fruit answering to the service performed by such dependents, because his desires are already fulfilled. So agency and the rest, which belong to the servant and the like, are denied of the liberated one. (The source breaks off as it begins to state the basis of agency.)
Śrī Bhāskara
Modern
These commentators agree that God is no doer and that Nature does everything, but they bring out different notes. One reads it as the rule of law: the inexorable law of karma prevails, and God's mercy and justice lie precisely in giving everyone his deserts and making everyone reap what he sows; in undiluted justice is mercy. But because a human being cannot know past, present and future, for him the law is reversed and forgiveness becomes the purest justice, and only by cultivating forgiveness can he reach the state of the unbound yogi. Another keeps the reading plain: the Lord never presses anyone, never says 'do this or that', and Nature does it all. A non-sectarian devotional source adds that 'prabhu' is used because creating the universe is the work of the qualified, all-capable God who is ruler and controller of all, yet who remains a non-doer even while creating; a person fashions his own doership through ignorance by identifying with matter, and if doership were really set up by God, then Krishna could not have told the Sankhya-yogi a few verses earlier not to take himself as the doer.
Mahatma Gandhi · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
If God does not create my doership, my actions, or my fruits, then who is responsible for what I do, and is God simply absent from my moral life?
The verse does not make God absent and it does not make you unaccountable; it relocates where responsibility sits. What drives action is svabhava, your own nature, the beginningless tendency of ignorance and desire that operates through body, senses and mind. The sense of being the doer is something you take on by identifying with that nature, not something God installs in you.
Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Swami Ramsukhdas
God is not absent; He is the regulator of a process already in motion, not its first author. This is precisely how several commentators clear God of cruelty or favoritism: He does not manufacture good and bad deeds in people, so the unevenness of the world rests with ignorance, not with Him. The law of karma still runs, giving each person the fruit of his own deeds, and that very lawfulness is where divine justice and mercy are found.
Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Mahatma Gandhi · Swami Ramsukhdas
So responsibility lands on the nature you have been identifying with, and the way out is to stop owning that identification. The true Self illumines everything like the sun yet impels nothing; once you see that doership and its fruits belong to nature and not to you, the actions continue but they no longer bind. That recognition, not a denial of moral seriousness, is what the verse is pointing you toward.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Vallabhācārya · Swami Ramsukhdas
Contemplation
Here is the practical hinge this verse offers. Watch where you place the sense 'I am the doer'. All your actions actually run through nature, through the body, senses and mind that belong to the field of matter. The trouble begins only when, through ignorance, you identify with that nature and say 'I am doing this'. That identification is not something God set up in you; you fashion the sense of doership yourself. So the work is to keep noticing that the deeds go on in nature while you, the witness, neither command them nor own their fruits. When you stop pinning doership on yourself, the very same actions go on, but they no longer bind you. This is exactly why Krishna earlier told the yogi not to think 'I am the doer': the freedom was always available, because the doership was never truly yours to begin with.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.