Chapter 14 · Verse 27·Spoken by Arjuna
ब्रह्मणो हि प्रतिष्ठाऽहममृतस्याव्ययस्य च।शाश्वतस्य च धर्मस्य सुखस्यैकान्तिकस्य च
brahmaṇo hi pratiṣhṭhāham amṛitasyāvyayasya cha śhāśhvatasya cha dharmasya sukhasyaikāntikasya cha
For I am the ground of Brahman, the immortal and changeless, the eternal dharma, and absolute bliss.
Word by Word
Saved for this reading session
Three movements · tap a label to switch
Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda
Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur
Synthesis · a glossed leaf
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
his verse gives the reason for the promise just made in 14.26, that the unwavering devotee 'becomes fit to be Brahman.' The Sanskrit opens with 'hi,' which means 'because' or 'for,' so the whole verse is an explanation, not a new topic. Krishna explains why his devotee can reach the state of Brahman: it is because he himself is the 'pratiṣhṭhā,' the foundation or ground, of Brahman. 'Pratiṣhṭhā' literally means that in which a thing stands or rests, its support or resting-place. So the devotee who serves Krishna is not reaching past him to some higher Brahman; he is reaching the very ground in which Brahman itself stands.
Braided from 15 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
The four things Krishna names are heaped up as objects of that single foundation: he is the ground of 'amṛita' (the immortal, the deathless), of 'avyaya' (the imperishable, the changeless that does not decay), of 'śhāśhvata dharma' (the everlasting or eternal dharma, the law that does not perish), and of 'sukha aikāntika' (happiness that is absolute, single-pointed, unswerving, not the fleeting pleasure born of the senses meeting their objects). Several commentators take the immortal and the imperishable to point to liberation itself, the deathless and indestructible release; the eternal dharma to be the steady spiritual discipline (knowledge for some, devotion for others) by which it is reached; and the absolute happiness to be the bliss that is Krishna's own nature, supreme and unbroken, marked off here precisely from ordinary sense-pleasure.
Braided from 14 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Swami Ramsukhdas · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda
Because Krishna (or, in the non-dual reading, the inmost Self) is the very ground of these supreme realities, serving him is the direct and sufficient means to reach them. The whole logic is that the devotee does not have to bypass the Lord to attain Brahman, immortality, the eternal dharma, or absolute bliss; he attains all of them by attaining the one in whom they are grounded. This closes the chapter's argument: transcending the three guṇas and becoming fit for Brahman is accomplished through unwavering devotion to Krishna, because he is the foundation of everything the seeker is reaching for.
Braided from 13 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Swami Ramsukhdas · Lokmanya Tilak · Ācārya Abhinavagupta
This verse closes the fourteenth chapter, the Yoga of the Division of the Three Guṇas. Several commentators sum up the chapter's whole movement here: it has shown how the world arises from the union of the field and the knower of the field, how the three guṇas (sattva, rajas, tamas) bind the embodied self, what the means of rising beyond them is, and what the one who has risen beyond them looks like. The settled conclusion they draw is that bondage is union with the guṇas, liberation is transcending them, and that transcendence is accomplished through devotion alone.
Braided from 8 commentators
Śrī Ānandagiri · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda · Mahatma Gandhi · Swami Ramsukhdas
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
The 'I' who is the foundation of Brahman is the inmost Self (pratyagatman), and the 'Brahman' it grounds is the supreme Self described as deathless, imperishable, eternal, and of the nature of bliss. The point of saying the inmost Self is the 'ground' of Brahman is that, by right knowledge, the inmost Self is determined to be none other than the supreme Self; there is no real distinction between them. One source offers a second reading: where Brahman is named with distinction (the conditioned or qualified Brahman, saguṇa), the distinctionless inmost Self is its ground, and the Lord's very power by which Brahman engages to favour devotees is itself Brahman, since power and its holder are not different. Another source develops this through the relation of the conditioned and the unconditioned: the supremely real, non-conceptual being-consciousness-bliss is the unconditioned Vāsudeva in whom even the conditioned cause-Brahman rests, since the imagined is non-distinct from its substrate, so nothing supremely real exists apart from him. The eternal dharma is glossed as steadiness in knowledge (jñāna-niṣhṭhā), and the happiness as that born of such knowledge, warding off sense-born pleasure. One source adds that this lower teaching, framing Krishna as the resting-place, is given for the seeker unable to ascend directly to the highest realization.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
Viśiṣṭādvaita
The verse fastens the personal Lord's standing above Brahman as ordinarily understood. The Lord is not exhausted by the impersonal Brahman; rather the impersonal Brahman has the personal Lord as its inner ground. So the candidate who, having transcended the guṇas, attains Brahman in fact attains what is grounded in the Lord, and the Lord is the true ultimate destination. The Lord, served by the discipline of unwavering devotion, is the foundation of the immortal and undecaying, of the everlasting law (here taken as surpassing eternal lordship), and of the single-pointed happiness attainable by the man of knowledge. Although 'everlasting dharma' names a means, it is read as a thing to be attained because the items around it are things to be attained. The whole chapter is read as teaching that transcending the guṇas has single-pointed refuge in the Lord as its one and only means, and the state of Brahman is preceded by that refuge.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
Uniquely, this school takes 'Brahman' here to mean not the supreme reality but māyā. The Lord says he is the foundation of māyā. One source defends this against the reading that takes 'Brahman' as the supreme Brahman: that reading, it argues, is unsound, because the very statement 'I am the foundation' shows the Lord stands above and distinct from what he founds; he founds it, so he cannot be identical with it. The objection that taking 'Brahman' as māyā is a figurative, secondary use is rejected, because the meaning is possible in its primary sense and there is no warrant for going figurative. This source further identifies the māyā in question with Mahālakṣmī. The thrust is to preserve the Lord's distinctness from and supremacy over what he supports, rather than collapsing him into it.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Śuddhādvaita
Krishna here declares his own supremacy (paratva) by sealing the chapter with the Puṣhṭimārga teaching that the four things named are not four separate destinations but four names for resting in him. He is the root-place of the imperishable Brahman (the akṣhara-brahman), being the abode of all lordship; of the immortal, that is liberation and the bliss of Brahman; of the eternal sanātana dharma whose end is liberation; and of the absolute, uncountable bliss of devotion (bhajana-ānanda). One source unpacks these as the abode even of eternal Vaikuṇṭha and of scriptural devotion. The decisive move is that the gunless akṣhara itself stands established in Krishna, so the guṇa-transcender's 'becoming Brahman' is not vanishing into a gunless absolute but the devotee's standing in the one in whom the akṣhara itself stands. The chapter's knowledge of reality (tattva-jñāna) is therefore not a settlement of the guṇas but a being-brought to him.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhakti
Krishna is the 'pratiṣhṭhā' of Brahman in the sense of being Brahman in condensed, solidified form (its pratimā, its dense seat): as light, condensed, is itself the sun's orb, so Vāsudeva is Brahman made dense. Brahman is not behind Vāsudeva waiting to swallow him at the end; Vāsudeva is the very ground in which Brahman stands, so to serve him by unwavering devotion is to enter the ground in which Brahman rests. One source reads the eternal dharma as the supreme dharma named devotion, which abides in both the state of means and the state of fruit, and the absolute happiness as the love (prema) belonging to the one-pointed devotee, and marshals scriptural authorities (Vishnu Purana, Brahma-samhita, Harivamsha, Bhagavata) that the supreme Self, even Brahman, has the Lord as its support. One source, reading from the standpoint of the eternally distinct liberated soul, takes 'I am the foundation of the immortal' to mean the Lord is the supreme resort and dearest beloved of the liberated one, who, of one taste with the Lord through likeness of form, abides with him in unbroken nearness, never separated and never returning; and identifies the higher fruit as taking refuge in the Lord to relish his wondrous play, the very bliss the scripture calls rasa. The Marathi source states plainly that Brahman means only Krishna's own Self, with no more distinction than between the moon and her disc.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar
Kashmir Shaivism
Krishna alone is the ground of Brahman: it is only because of him that Brahman 'comes to be.' This source presses a vivid warning: when the Lord is served, Brahman truly comes to be for the seeker; but Brahman worshipped merely as a thing of insentient, inert form would bring about a release no different from deep sleep. So the living, conscious ground matters; an impersonal absolute treated as inert yields only a blank, sleep-like liberation, not the real thing.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Modern
One source preserves the non-dual reading: the innermost Self, seen by the eye of intuition to be the very Supreme Self, is the abode of the Supreme Self; it also offers the conditioned-Brahman reading, with the Lord's grace flowing to devotees through his inseparable power (śakti or māyā), inseparable as heat from fire. One source reads the verse as the chapter's settlement that once Sāṃkhya dualism is given up only one Supreme Lord remains, reached by worshipping him, while the Gita stays undogmatic about which path one takes to him. One source presses a thoroughgoing non-difference (abhinnatā): Krishna is not one thing and Brahman another; the genitive 'of Brahman' is like 'the head of Rāhu,' where Rāhu and the head are not two; so Krishna himself is Brahman, the immortal, the eternal dharma, and the absolute happiness, with no ground-and-grounded duality at all, which is why worship of him yields Brahman without remainder. One source marks only the chapter's close.
Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas · Mahatma Gandhi
A Seeker Asks
If Krishna calls himself the 'foundation of Brahman,' is he claiming to be above Brahman, the same as Brahman, or something less, and how can one verse hold such opposite readings?
Start with what all the readings share: the word 'pratiṣhṭhā' means the ground or resting-place in which a thing stands, and the verse uses it to explain why serving Krishna lets the devotee reach Brahman. Whatever the metaphysics, the practical upshot is the same across the schools: you do not have to get past the Lord to reach Brahman, immortality, the eternal dharma, or absolute bliss, because he is the very ground in which all of them stand.
Braided from 7 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Vallabhācārya · Swami Ramsukhdas
The opposite-sounding readings come from where each school already stands. For the non-dualists, 'I am the ground of Brahman' means the inmost Self is, by true knowledge, none other than the supreme Self, so the apparent two-ness dissolves into identity. For the personalist and devotional schools, it means the personal Lord is the inner ground of the impersonal Brahman, so the Lord, not a bare absolute, is the true final destination; one devotional voice puts it as Krishna being Brahman in condensed form, as the sun's orb is condensed light. The non-difference reading goes furthest, treating the genitive 'of Brahman' like 'the head of Rāhu,' where the two words name one thing, so Krishna simply is Brahman with no ground-and-grounded gap.
Braided from 7 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Swami Ramsukhdas
One school reads it the other way precisely to keep the Lord distinct and supreme: it takes 'Brahman' here to mean māyā, arguing that the very phrase 'I am the foundation' shows the Lord stands over what he founds rather than being identical with it. So the single verse holds opposite readings because the word 'foundation' can be heard either as collapsing a distinction (he is what he grounds) or as marking one (he supports what is other than him); each school hears it in line with its settled view of how the Lord and Brahman relate.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Contemplation
Hold this verse not as a ranking puzzle but as a quiet reassurance about your own path. Whether you are drawn to knowledge and reach toward the formless Brahman, or drawn to love and reach toward a personal Lord, you are reaching for one and the same reality. As a single fire is the same fire whether it blazes openly in the flame or lies hidden in the wood, so the formless and the personal are two forms of the one. As one food gives fragrance to the nose and taste to the tongue, so the one reality meets the knower as Brahman and the devotee as Bhagavan. So do not worry that devotion is a lesser road, or that you must abandon your chosen form to reach the goal. The immortal, the eternal dharma, and the absolute happiness you long for are not separate destinations stacked beyond the Lord; they are his very nature. To worship him is therefore to gain Brahman itself, without remainder.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.