Chapter 13 · Verse 30·Spoken by Arjuna
प्रकृत्यैव च कर्माणि क्रियमाणानि सर्वशः।यः पश्यति तथाऽऽत्मानमकर्तारं स पश्यति
prakṛityaiva cha karmāṇi kriyamāṇāni sarvaśhaḥ yaḥ paśhyati tathātmānam akartāraṁ sa paśhyati
Whoever sees that all actions are done by Nature alone, and that the Self does nothing, truly sees.
Word by Word
Saved for this reading session
Three movements · tap a label to switch
Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda
Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur
Synthesis · a glossed leaf
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
he verse turns on a single act of right seeing: all action is done by prakriti, Nature, and the Self is akarta, the non-doer. Prakriti here is unpacked as the threefold maya of the Lord, made of the three gunas (qualities), which transforms itself into the body and the senses, the field of all activity. So whatever gets done by speech, by mind, and by body is done in every way by Nature alone. Shankara cites the Shvetashvatara line 'one should know maya to be Nature' to anchor this. The one who sees this, and who at the same time sees the Self, the kshetrajna or field-knower, as standing apart from all this doing, free of every limiting adjunct: that one truly sees. He is called the seer of the supreme truth.
Braided from 12 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Vedānta Deśika · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Madhvācārya
Several commentators explain that the verse answers a pressing objection. Bodies plainly differ: some do good and some do bad, some meet pleasure and some pain, and the doers seem unequal from body to body. So how can the earlier teaching stand, that one should see the same Self equally in all beings? The answer is that the inequality belongs to prakriti, not to the Self. It is Nature, transformed into the various body-and-sense aggregates, that performs the uneven, good-and-bad actions; the Self remains one, featureless, everywhere the same. Just as there is no division in space, there is no proof of any division in the non-doer Self.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śaṅkarācārya
The apparent doership of the Self is explained as borrowed, not real. The Self looks like a doer only because of identification with the body, mind, and senses; by its own nature it does nothing. Sridhara says the agentship belonging to the Self is only through identification with the body and not by His own nature. Sivananda gives the image of the motionless sky across which the clouds move: the Self stays still while Nature does everything. Abhinavagupta describes the settled understanding 'it is prakriti alone that does this, I do nothing at all', so that even while doing everything one does nothing. This is the state of being no agent.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
This seeing is not merely a doctrine to hold but a practice to live. The candidate is to carry the vision into the very actions he himself performs, treating them as prakriti's doings and not his own. Ramsukhdas spells out the discipline: where the body-identified person says 'I am walking, I am speaking, I am thinking', the seeker in the light of this verse says 'the body walks, the senses speak, the mind thinks, and I, the field-knower, am the one who lights all this up, not its doer'. The moment one settles into this seeing, kartritva (doership) falls away; with doership goes bhoktritva (enjoyership), then attachment to the gunas, and so the very cause of rebirth.
Vedānta Deśika · Swami Ramsukhdas · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Vallabhācārya
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
For these commentators the Self is wholly distinctionless, like space, and the upshot of the verse is that no division can even be proved in it. Nature is the Lord's threefold maya, and once all action is assigned to it, the non-doer Self is left as one homogeneous, quality-free reality. The vision is read as the direct insight born of teaching that dissolves the manifoldness of beings and their modifications back into the one Self alone; liberation is held to be simultaneous with this knowledge, since the cause of un-fullness, taking all to be other than oneself, is removed when all is made one's own Self.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
Viśiṣṭādvaita
These commentators stress that beings are made of two principles, prakriti (nature) and purusha (person), and that the seeing fastens agency firmly onto nature. The varied states of being, being a god, a man, short, tall, and the spreading line of son and grandson, all rest in nature and not in the self. When one sees this and sees the self as the non-doer, one becomes Brahman, attaining the self whose single form is unbounded knowledge. The emphasis falls on carrying this agency-doctrine into one's own deeds: they are prakriti's, not one's own.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
Madhva's reading is terse: he who sees the self too as a non-doer truly sees. Jayatirtha guards the precise construction. He rejects reading the verse as merely 'one who sees that actions are done by nature alone sees the self as non-doer', because that would make the word 'thus' (tatha) redundant. On his reading the one who truly sees is the one who sees the supreme Lord, so the seeing of the non-doer self is bound together with seeing the Lord.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Śuddhādvaita
These commentators set the verse against a Sankhya backdrop where action and even agency, by way of bearing effort, rest in prakriti and not in the bare atomic conscious jiva-self. Vallabha adds a distinctive meditation: by continually following up one's being a portion of Purushottama as the primary agent, when the body and its particular conditioners come into play, the agency there is itself of worldly form; seeing at the end one's own form as without conditioner and the atman as non-agent, one is truly the seer. Purushottama stresses that prakriti is fit only for play (lila) and that the jiva is incapable of all doing in the absence of the Lord's wish; the one who sees this sees the Supreme Lord, while others are blind.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhakti
Sridhara reads the verse closely as the answer to the inequality objection, locating all uneven good-and-bad agency in prakriti as transformed into body and sense, with the Self a non-doer whose seeming agentship comes only from bodily identification. Vishvanatha, Baladeva, and Jnaneshwari, however, comment on the verse in the form 'the manifold beings rest in the one nature at dissolution and expand from that same nature at creation, and then one attains Brahman'. Jnaneshwari gives vivid images: ripples in water, atoms in earth, rays in the sun, sparks in one fire, the diverse forms are of one single soul, and seeing this through the vision of knowledge one finds nothing anywhere but the Supreme Brahman, bringing infinite bliss. Baladeva specifies that one perceives this separateness as not resting in the self and so sees the self as distinct from one's own primordial nature, attaining the Brahman that has the great eightfold set of qualities, freedom from sin and the rest.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar
Kashmir Shaivism
Abhinavagupta reads the verse as describing a most steady understanding: 'it is prakriti alone that does this, I do nothing at all'. For one settled in this, even while doing everything he does nothing. The accent is on the inner conviction of non-agency as a stable state rather than on cosmology or argument.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Modern
Sivananda makes the witness explicit: Nature, through the organs of knowledge and action, mind, and intellect, is responsible for all activity, while the Self is the actionless silent witness; the man who identifies with body, mind, and senses and thinks the Self is the actor is ignorant and sees only with physical eyes. Ramsukhdas frames the verse as a sadhana that turns the earlier seeing into practice, tracing how the fall of doership unwinds the whole chain of enjoyership, attachment to the gunas, and rebirth, and links it to the next verse's vision of the manifold established in the one. Gandhi-Desai reads the wider passage devotionally: to realize that everything rests in Brahman is to attain to the state of Brahman, and then the individual soul (jiva) becomes Shiva.
Swami Sivananda · Mahatma Gandhi · Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
If Nature does everything and I am only the non-doing witness, does that not dissolve my responsibility for what I do?
The verse is not handing you an excuse; it is correcting a misidentification. What it removes from the Self is not care but a false claim: the sense that the pure witness is itself the agent. The doership that is being denied is the one borrowed from identifying with body, mind, and senses, the agentship that belongs to the Self only through bodily identification and not by its own nature.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
Far from licensing carelessness, the teaching is offered as a discipline to live inside your actions, not outside them. The candidate is told to carry this seeing into the very actions he himself performs, treating them as prakriti's doings; Abhinavagupta's settled person, even while doing everything, does nothing, because his inner conviction is steady, not because he stops acting.
Vedānta Deśika · Ācārya Abhinavagupta
And the fruit is the opposite of moral collapse. Ramsukhdas shows that when doership genuinely falls away, so does enjoyership, the grasping after results, and the attachment to the gunas that fuels rebirth. The witness who no longer claims the deed also no longer clings to its reward, which is a deeper freedom from selfish action, not a loophole around it.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Swami Sivananda
Contemplation
Try this as a quiet practice through an ordinary day. The body-identified habit keeps saying 'I am walking, I am speaking, I am thinking'. Each time you catch it, gently correct the seeing: the body walks, the senses speak, the mind thinks, and I, the field-knower, am only the one who lights all of this up, not its doer. You do not stop acting; you simply stop claiming the action as yours. Ramsukhdas says that the instant you settle into this seeing, doership falls away, and with doership goes enjoyership, and with enjoyership goes the clinging to the gunas that drives rebirth. So this is not a way to become passive or careless. It is a way to keep acting while standing, as witness, in your own real nature.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.