Skip to the verse
V.2913.2813.30

Chapter 13 · Verse 29·Spoken by Arjuna

समं पश्यन्हि सर्वत्र समवस्थितमीश्वरम्।न हिनस्त्यात्मनाऽऽत्मानं ततो याति परां गतिम्

samaṁ paśhyan hi sarvatra samavasthitam īśhvaram na hinasty ātmanātmānaṁ tato yāti parāṁ gatim

Seeing the Lord present everywhere alike, such a person does not injure the Self by the Self. So he reaches the supreme goal.

Word by Word

samamequallypaśhyanseehiindeedsarvatraeverywheresamavasthitamequally presentīśhvaramGod as the Supreme soulnado nothinastidegradeātmanāby one’s mindātmānamthe selftataḥtherebyyātireachparāmthe supremegatimdestination
—:—— / —:——

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

Reading size

Synthesis · a glossed leaf

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

he verse states the practical fruit of the equal vision taught just before it. The one who sees the Lord (ishvara) present everywhere, settled the same way in every being, gains something real: he does not destroy or harm the Self by the self, and so he reaches the supreme goal, which the commentators uniformly identify as liberation (moksha). So the verse is Krishna praising right seeing by showing what it accomplishes. The seeing is not a private mood; it has a definite result in the seer's own destiny.

Braided from 11 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas

The strange phrase 'he does not harm the Self by the self' is explained by its opposite: the ignorant person actually does harm his own Self. The harm is not physical injury but a kind of self-cancellation done through avidya, ignorance. The ignorant man takes the body, senses, and mind for the Self, and by treating the ever-present, real Self as if it were not there, he in effect makes the existent into the non-existent. Several commentators sharpen this with the image of the 'self-stealer': he who takes the Self that is one way as being another way is a thief of his own Self, and there is no sin he has not committed. So the harm is a self-betrayal that ignorance commits, and the seer of the equal Lord simply stops committing it.

Braided from 8 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas

Because the ignorant man identifies with the body, when that body dies he 'slays' the Self he had grasped and takes up a new body, and slays that in turn, life after life. So the ordinary person is, in the Lord's reckoning, a repeated slayer of the Self, locked into birth and death. The one who sees the Lord equally everywhere breaks this cycle: he no longer claims the body's doings and sufferings as his own, so his true nature is not buried, and he is freed from the round of birth and death. Some quote scripture here about the dark, demonic worlds to which 'slayers of the Self' go, to underline how grave the stakes are.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas

The supreme goal reached is described as liberation, the cessation of ignorance and its effects, and the gaining of one's own true nature. It is not the acquiring of something foreign but the recovery of what one already is once the false identification is dropped. The seer attains his own svarupa, his real form, which the commentators variously name as the Self of being-consciousness-bliss (sat-cit-ananda) or, in the devotional voices, the supreme abode of the Lord.

Braided from 6 commentators

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Swami Ramsukhdas · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śaṅkarācārya

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

On this reading the Self that is 'not harmed' is the one, non-doer, non-enjoyer Self of being-consciousness-bliss, and the harm done by the ignorant is precisely the superimposing of body and mind onto that Self through avidya. The equal vision works because the supreme is quality-less: even though selves seem divided by their different qualities, pleasures, pains, and their own works of merit and demerit, the real Self underneath is the same everywhere, so seeing it as the same is correct seeing, not a forced flattening. One source frames the verse as Krishna's answer to exactly this objection, that the differences between embodied selves would seem to make equal vision impossible; the resolution is that those differences belong to nature, not to the quality-less supreme. Liberation is the cessation of that ignorance and its effects.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī

Bhakti

Here the equal one seen everywhere is named the Paramatman, the supreme Self standing in every being in His undeviating own-form. The one who does not see this is a 'beholder of the Self in the body' and so destroys the Self along with the body; the cited scripture about the dark worlds of the Self-slayers presses the warning home. The accent falls on the Paramatman as the equal presence within all, and on the contrast between beholding the Self in the body and beholding it as the deathless one.

Śrīdhara Svāmī

Śuddhādvaita

On this reading the supreme goal reached is explicitly the abode of Bhagavan, the imperishable Self of being-consciousness-bliss, the Vaikuntha-named going. The Lord seen as the same is set in all worldly matter by His own mode for the sake of His play (lila), joined with all capacity; the seer, by his own lila-form, does not come to take the Self otherwise but knows it as it truly is and so takes refuge. Beyond merely not-harming, this voice says the seer positively protects the Self, citing scripture that such a one crosses samsara and crosses death. The goal is thus framed devotionally as entry into the Lord's own dwelling, not only as the dissolving of ignorance.

Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama

Viśiṣṭādvaita

This voice reads 'not destroying the self' as the candidate not damaging his own progress. The wrong move is to perceive distinctions where the Lord is one, equally established everywhere; doing so harms one's spiritual advance. By seeing the Lord equally present, the aspirant keeps his progress intact and so reaches the supreme destination. The emphasis is on the seeker's path and its forward movement rather than on a metaphysical self-cancellation.

Vedānta Deśika

Kashmir Shaivism

Stated very briefly: the yogin whose understanding is everywhere alike does not harm himself, that is, does not let himself fall into the hard-to-cross ocean of transmigration. The harm avoided is concretely sinking into samsara, and the safeguard is an understanding that is uniform everywhere.

Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Advaita Vedānta

One reading offers a second, ethical sense alongside the inward one: by seeing the Lord settled equally in all bodies as in one's own, the seer becomes compassionate to all and 'does not harm another as he would not harm himself.' On this option the not-harming reaches outward to other beings, not only inward to one's own Self, and this compassion is itself why the supreme abode is reached.

Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha

Modern

This voice presses on the verb 'hinasti', harms, as deliberately startling: the man who fails to see the same Lord everywhere is, in Bhagavan's own reckoning, actually committing himatsa, harm, against himself. The mechanism is precise: the kshetrajna, the knower of the field, imposes the body's vikaras, its changes, upon himself and thereby buries his own svarupa. The sadhak who sees the Lord equally settled everywhere simply does not impose: he does not claim doership for the body's actions or enjoyership for its pleasure and pain, so his real nature stays unburied. The cure, this voice insists, is the seeing itself and nothing else, and the goal reached is svarupa-prapti, gaining the very nature of Bhagavan.

Swami Ramsukhdas

A Seeker Asks

If the Self can never really be killed, what does it actually mean to say that the ignorant person harms or slays his own Self?

The slaying is not literal destruction of an indestructible Self; it is a self-cancellation worked by ignorance. The ignorant person, with the real and ever-present Self right before him, treats it as if it were not there and grasps the body and mind as the Self instead. In effect he makes the existent into the non-existent for himself, which is why the commentators call him a thief of his own Self.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrīdhara Svāmī

There is also a concrete, ongoing form of this harm. Because he has identified with the body, when the body dies he loses the Self he had taken hold of and grasps a new body, and loses that in turn, life after life. So 'slaying the Self' names the whole machinery of repeated birth and death set going by false identification.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Swami Sivananda

Put most plainly, the harm is the burying of your own true nature under the body's changes by claiming its doing and its feeling as yourself. Seen this way the verse is hopeful: since the harm is only this false claim, the equal vision of the one Lord everywhere undoes it at once, the real nature is no longer buried, and that recovery of one's own being is the supreme goal.

Swami Ramsukhdas · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama

Contemplation

Notice how strong the word is: the Gita does not say the person who misses this is merely mistaken. It says he is doing harm, himatsa, to himself. The harm has a clear shape. You take on the body's changes as your own; you say 'I am the doer' of what the body does and 'I am the enjoyer' of its pleasures and pains. Every time you do that, you bury your own real nature a little deeper. The remedy is not a new technique or a harder effort. It is simply the seeing: that the same Lord is settled everywhere, in you and in all. When you stop claiming the body's doing and the body's feeling as yourself, nothing buries your nature anymore, and what surfaces is your own true being, the very nature of the Lord. So the practice is to keep dropping the claim, doership for what the body does and enjoyership for what it feels, and to keep resting in the equal presence that was never absent.

Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.