Skip to the verse
V.2013.1913.21

Chapter 13 · Verse 20·Spoken by Arjuna

प्रकृतिं पुरुषं चैव विद्ध्यनादी उभावपि।विकारांश्च गुणांश्चैव विद्धि प्रकृतिसंभवान्

prakṛitiṁ puruṣhaṁ chaiva viddhy anādī ubhāv api vikārānśh cha guṇānśh chaiva viddhi prakṛiti-sambhavān

Know that both nature and the self are without beginning. And know that the modifications and the qualities are born of nature.

Word by Word

prakṛitimmaterial naturepuruṣhamthe individual soulschaandevaindeedviddhiknowanādībeginninglessubhaubothapiandvikārāntransformations (of the body)chaalsoguṇānthe three modes of naturechaandevaindeedviddhiknowprakṛitimaterial energysambhavānproduced by
—:—— / —:——

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

Reading size

Synthesis · a glossed leaf

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

he verse introduces a new analysis. Krishna names two great realities, prakriti and purusha, and tells Arjuna to know both as beginningless. Prakriti is Nature, the material side of things; in earlier chapters it was called the lower nature. Purusha is the conscious self, the knower; earlier it was called the higher nature. So this verse picks up the thread already laid down: the higher and lower natures named before are exactly the purusha and prakriti named now, so there is no contradiction between the earlier teaching and this one. The two together are the whole basis of the world and of individual existence.

Braided from 9 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Vedānta Deśika · Śrī Puruṣottama · Vallabhācārya

Both prakriti and purusha are anadi, beginningless: neither was ever produced, neither came into being at some moment. The commentators argue this is not a loose claim but a logical necessity. If Nature itself had a beginning, it would need a prior cause, and that cause a still prior cause, with no end, the fault of infinite regress. And if the conscious self had a beginning, then the pleasures and sorrows a person now reaps could not be traced to prior good and bad deeds; the work one has done would be lost and results one never earned would arrive uncaused. To avoid both errors, both must be held as beginningless and eternal.

Braided from 7 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas · Ācārya Abhinavagupta

All change belongs to Nature, never to the self. The vikaras, the modifications such as the body and the senses, and the gunas, the three strands of sattva, rajas and tamas that show up as pleasure, pain and delusion, are all prakriti-sambhava, born of Nature alone. The conscious self is changeless; it does not transform. This is the heart of the verse for the seeker: everything that shifts, stirs, and alters has its source in Nature, and the self stays untouched behind it all.

Braided from 11 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas · Vedānta Deśika · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Madhvācārya

Prakriti and purusha play complementary roles, and bondage and release both turn on their relation. When the two are joined, the round of birth and death, samsara, arises; when they are separated, that is liberation. Several commentators sharpen this with a division of labor: Nature is the cause of the body, senses, and all activity, while the conscious self is the cause of the experiencing of pleasure and pain. Activity is on Nature's side; experiencing is on the self's side.

Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

Prakriti is the Lord's own power, his maya made of the three gunas, and both natures belong to the eternal Lord. The very possession of two natures, higher and lower, is what makes him the Lord; through them he is the cause of the world's arising, continuance, and dissolution. These sources reject the alternative that prakriti and purusha are self-standing eternals making the world on their own; if they were, then before they arose there would be nothing for the Lord to rule, he would be no Lord, transmigration would be uncaused so there could be no release, and scripture would have no purpose. Bondage and liberation hold together only when the Lord and his two natures are all eternal. The conscious self here is the individual self, kept distinct from the supreme Self, and its transmigration is explained as nothing but its experiencing of pleasure and pain.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrī Ānandagiri

Viśiṣṭādvaita

The body is the effect and the senses with the mind are the causes; Nature, when presided over by the person, is itself the cause of the activity that serves as the means of experience. But the person's role is only presiding, an overseeing; the person's agency is just being the cause of the effort that governs the body. The inner stir of the world arises from prakriti, not from purusha as such. Notably, though the person in itself enjoys only the single happiness of experiencing its own self, when conjoined with Nature it becomes the seat of the experiencing of the pleasure and pain that belong to outer objects.

Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika

Kashmir Shaivism

Prakriti, its modification which is the fourteenfold creation, and the person are all beginningless and eternal for one root reason: being suffused with the truth of Brahman, none of them is other than Brahman. Between prakriti and the person there is a mutual working, each depending on the other like the lame man and the blind man, and it is for this reason that the scriptural authors give the person many names such as 'the overseer.' The person, being the principal one, is the enjoyer.

Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Dvaita

The field is the whole class of conscious and unconscious things, everything other than the Lord. The word 'nature' here takes in the twenty-four principles beginning with the great elements; the word 'spirit' means the individual self; and the modifications, the three qualities and the rest, are stated separately by a deliberate intention of speech even though they too are part of the field. These sources reject reading the 'qualities' as merely pleasure, pain, and delusion construed as effect and cause; the three qualities of goodness, passion, and darkness are both what is effect and what is not effect. The verse states things 'in brief' precisely because the spirit will be taken up again later, and this avoids the fault of repetition.

Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha

Bhakti

Prakriti is beginningless because she is the shakti of the beginningless Lord, and purusha is beginningless because it is mad-amsa, a portion of that very Lord; so the self is not a creature made in time but as eternal as the Lord himself. On the joint working: although being effect, cause, agent, and enjoyer might all look like properties of Nature, the insentient side predominates in being effect, cause, and agent, while the conscious side predominates in enjoyment; so by the rule that names follow what predominates, Nature is called the cause in producing the body and the self is called the cause in enjoying. The conscious self presides over Nature, which becomes as if conscious through conjunction with him, and she, presided over and transforming by his deeds, brings forth the various bodies. One source pictures this as a strange marriage: Nature is the wife who does all the work and gives birth to the whole universe, while purusha is the husband who simply enjoys the fruit, the two utterly unlike yet bound together.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar

Śuddhādvaita

Prakriti and purusha are read as the Lord's own shakti and own portion, both beginningless by their connection to the Lord, both of sat-cit nature and non-different from the cause-form. This is the Bhagavata-Sankhya, not the worldly Sankhya: Nature is the Lord's power, not an independent eternal, and the Lord himself is never made an object of that science. The deeper key is that the body and faculties are not an alien deposit of karma to be repudiated; they are the place where the Lord's lila has stood and the very ground on which the discipline of the knower of the field becomes possible. The same Nature, joined with avidya, is the cause of bondage through her modifications of desire and aversion, and the same Nature, recognized through the knowledge fashioned of maya, with her modifications such as humility, becomes the cause of deathlessness. The bhakta who holds this reading does not look on his body as something to throw away but as the field unfolded for the sake of the Purushottama's rasa.

Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama

Modern

These voices hold that the discussion here is about the body and the self, not about cosmology, and they read the verse accordingly. One notes that some texts read 'karya-karana,' meaning the twenty-three Sankhya elements springing one from another, but argues that in a discussion of the body and the self a treatment of the world's origin is out of place, since how the world springs from prakriti was already explained earlier; on that ground prakriti is said to be the cause for the activity of the body and the senses, while purusha, without being a doer, is the cause for experiencing pleasure and pain. Another grounds the self's beginninglessness in plain observation: even a newborn child smiles and feels grief, fear, and pleasure, which cannot come from this life's deeds, so the impressions of a prior birth must exist and the self must be beginningless, or else two faults follow, deeds done bearing no fruit and fruits arriving for deeds never done. Distinctively, one of these voices turns the whole verse into a practice: since the vikaras and gunas are all Nature's doings and not the self's, the seeker is to give back to Nature everything that is Nature's, and what then remains is the self alone, pure, untouched, one with the supreme.

Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas

A Seeker Asks

If I am the changeless self and every modification, including this very body and mind, belongs to Nature, then in what sense is anything that happens to me really mine?

The verse draws a clean line. All change, the body, the senses, and the three qualities that surface as pleasure, pain, and delusion, is born of Nature, not of you. The self does not transform at all. So in the strict sense, none of the changing states is yours; they are Nature's, and the freedom of this teaching is precisely that you can stop carrying them as your own burden.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas

Yet something genuine is still yours: the experiencing. Several commentators give a division of labor in which Nature is the cause of all the activity while the conscious self is the cause of the experiencing of pleasure and pain. Nature does the work; you are the one for whom it is felt. So what is 'mine' is not the doing or the flaw but the bare fact of being the conscious experiencer behind it.

Rāmānujācārya · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar

And there is a reason this matters rather than leaving you cold and detached. The self is beginningless and as eternal as its source; in several readings it is a portion of the Lord himself. The body and faculties, then, are not an alien intrusion to be despised but the very ground on which knowledge of the self becomes possible. What is truly yours is the changeless witness; the practice is to give Nature back what is Nature's and rest as that.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrī Puruṣottama · Swami Ramsukhdas

Contemplation

Here is a practice the verse itself offers. The whole tangle of a person's confusion is just one mistaken move: taking what belongs to Nature as belonging to oneself. The body changes, the senses act, pleasure and pain and delusion rise and fall; and the mind quietly claims all of it as 'my doing, my flaw, my state.' This verse asks you to do the reverse. Calmly hand back to Nature everything that is Nature's: every modification, every shift of mood, every quality of sattva, rajas, and tamas. Do not fight them and do not own them; simply return them to where they came from. When you have given back all that was only borrowed, see what remains. What remains is you yourself, pure and untouched, the very same as the supreme. You do not have to manufacture this self or reach it by effort; you only have to stop crediting it with what was never its own.

Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.