राम
All Satsangs

The Presence of a Guru

17:14261 views

Saar (Essence)

Ananta teaches that while the true Guru is the formless presence within, consciousness often requires an external form or living master to bridge the gap from delusion to the recognition that everything is master's grace.

Everything is naturally functioning in the light of the Guru; we don't need to switch on gravity.
The living master shows the possibility of existing in the world without the notion of 'what's in it for me.'
Kevalam means 'only is'—only the master's grace exists, functioning as the very light of our existence.

intimate

satgurugraceconsciousnessadvaita vedantadevotionmayaawakeningramana maharshi

Transcript

This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.

Ananta

Suppose that in your life everything was always taken care of. Everything was always taken care of. Then how would your inner attitude change if you knew this unwaveringly—that whatever it is, it is always taken care of? How would your inner attitude change? You see, the three words... and we could have said 'we rest in Master's grace' or 'we trust in Master's grace,' but the word 'kevalam' is very important because kevalam means 'only is.' Only is. And why would we say it if it is not our living experience? Of course, it doesn't seem for many of us that it is a constant living experience yet, and yet something already in our hearts knows that this is true: that only the Master's grace is kevalam.

Ananta

Now, this tells us a lot actually, because if only the Master's grace is, then the Master must always be there. His grace is functioning, her grace is functioning, so this Master must always be there. So which is that presence which is always there? Which presence is that that is always there? This is the presence of Being, Consciousness, God—it doesn't matter which term we use. So this existence is always there. So let's say this is the Guru, Satguru within, whatever terminology we want to use. So this one can be trusted completely.

Ananta

So when Guruji says leave your existence to existence, this existence is always there and it needs no help to run any of this. As soon as I am, then I see that the world is. It appears without any individual effort; it runs without individual effort. I don't need to pick up an Ananta to switch on gravity, like 'Ananta, please come up.' And then this world is functioning. All of this is naturally functioning in the light of whom, or in whose light? The Upanishads ask a very important question: In whose light does the sun exist? The sun seems to give life to all of this appearance, and in whose light is the sun perceived? So this Guru is the light of our existence. Therefore, everything is this Guru's grace. Everything is the doing and the experiencing of this one. That is why it is 'only the Master's grace is.'

Ananta

Now you might ask an important question, which is to say: You say that the Guru is within. You say the Guru is within, so why do we then come to an outer Guru? Why do we then need to come to that so-called living Master? It is because the game that Consciousness is playing, or has played, is that it has identified itself with name and form for so long that it plays this game of fooling itself, of delusion, that it can no longer relate to that which is nameless and formless.

Ananta

If I come to you and say to you that, 'Gopala, I know someone who can be your best friend.' 'Oh good, I'd like to meet this one.' 'You can't see him or her, you can't talk to him or her, you can find no actual quality about this one.' Then you will say, 'But how can I be friends with this one? I can't see them, I can't hear them, I can't have a conversation with them. What do you mean by friends?' So in the same way, all of us have grown up hearing these things—that the Guru is within—but it can sound too abstract that we don't understand how to communicate with this one, how to relate with this one.

Read more (7 more paragraphs) ↓
Ananta

In India, all of us hear that God is formless, God is everywhere, God is all there is. We hear this, but how many forms of gods do we have? Millions. You see, in every street corner you'll see a different form. So what does this actually mean? It means that although God is formless, in the play of delusion, the Consciousness seems to have deluded itself with attachment or relating only with name and form. There needs to be a doorway. There needs to be something relatable. It can seem like this is the door to my true Being, my true Satguru.

Ananta

Then what happens? In some cultures, it is prescribed by some prophets or sages that this is a good representation, use this one. You see, the priest will prescribe, 'Okay, this is a good representation, let's use this form.' So you can have Jesus on the cross or some verses from the Quran. In India, it became very democratic. Whatever you like, you can make a form. Do you like... you would like to relate to the God that is naughty, playful, yet all-knowing and beautifully knowledgeable? Okay, let's make Krishna. You feel that God should be always righteous and struggle with all these human conditions and try to go through this journey of human exploration in a very authentic, vulnerable way? Then we have representations of Ram. So whatever form that you are, you can actually imagine there is a representation which can be made or is available already.

Ananta

And the beauty of any such form is that it takes you out of this 'me, me, me' to trust in a deeper, to trust in a more divine. And these forms also can be the forms of the Masters that have come and gone or still exist in their body. And this is beautiful because although some of us find it strange that why in India we put all of these photos of the Masters everywhere—you see, what is this about?—it's very good because at some point in time, we must have figured that the human nature has become so forgetful about the truth that everywhere I look, I want to be reminded. So here on this wall, Guruji is there. And then this next to the window, Guruji is... volume of the mic is full, my throat volume is not fuller.

Ananta

So these forms of those aspects of Consciousness which have awakened, who stepped out of the paradigm of the mind and have awakened to a deeper intuitive reality, they serve as good reminders for what possibility exists here in Consciousness. And I'm aware that some of these terms might sound a bit dualistic, but we are talking about how Consciousness operates within the Maya when it is deluded as if it is something. So to remind ourselves that everything is taken care of, we make... and initially we can even say we need an outer representation to show us this.

Ananta

I've often said that the beauty of having a living Master is that they show you the possibility that it is possible to exist in this world even with a body and family and work. All of this is completely possible without hanging on to the notion of 'what's in it for me' or the idea of 'me.' So this is a great blessing which is available to us. That is why whenever someone asks me, 'Do we need a Master in form?' I usually say that there is nothing in Consciousness which says that things must always be this way, but I have to say that from experience, I've never, never met one who has awakened to their inner truth without the presence of a Master in form.

Ananta

Even although Ramana Maharshi said that 'I have no human masters or disciples' for that matter, he also said that the mountain Arunachala was his Master. So that representation of Shiva then became his Master. The very Shiva... Shiva is the very source of all of this existence itself, and yet even for the greater sages, initially we need a representation. We seem to need a representation which can be given a form and has a name. So that is the value of having an outer or external Master.

Ananta

And we must always be grateful for Guruji's presence in our life because, at least for here, I can say that in the play of this life, in spite of so much learning, understanding, reading so many books, doing many, many, many practices, until I had the darshan of the Satguru within through looking into the eyes of Guruji, I did not step completely out of this paradigm of belief, this paradigm thought system. When I say it 'completely,' I use the term a bit loosely—there is no completely, mostly.

The Thread Continues

These satsangs touch the same silence.