Janaka's Joy of Self-Realization (Ashtavakra Gita 2.1 - 2.7) - 11th October 2016
Saar (Essence)
Ananta guides seekers to recognize their non-phenomenal reality as the essence of creation. He emphasizes that suffering arises from resisting change, whereas self-realization reveals the world as an inseparable appearance within one's own infinite being.
I am the essence of creation; this i-am-ness is the source and cannot be removed from the world.
It is this resistance to what is that is the ego. You cannot be open and suffer simultaneously.
You are the 'full nothing'—the primal knowingness from which God and the entire universe emanate as mere aspects.
contemplative
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
So we're on Chapter 2 of the Ashtavakra Gita, which is the joy of self-realization. Let me just run through the first few verses that we covered yesterday. Janaka now realized through the pointings of the master what his reality is, and now Janaka is speaking from that space and he is expressing the joy of self-realization. He says, 'I am now spotless and at peace, awareness beyond consciousness. All this time I have been duped by illusion. By this light alone the body and the universe appear. I am everything or nothing. Seeing there is no universe or body, by grace the Self is revealed. As waves, foam, and others are not different from water, so the universe emanating from Self is not different from Self. Look closely at cloth, you see only threads. Look closely at creation, you see only Self.' Then verse number 6 says, 'As sweetness pervades sugarcane juice, I am the essence of creation.' I am the essence of creation.
So this 'I am' is a fundamental basis of existence. It is existence itself. We cannot say something exists before I exist. You cannot say something is before this I am. So we can say that this entire manifest world relies on this existence—one existence, one consciousness, you see. Don't try to visualize this; confirm that this is true. That which exists only when I am, another seems to appear only when I am. So this I am-ness is the source and it cannot be removed from the world. Just like the same sense, you cannot remove sweetness from sugarcane juice because it is all-pervasive. In the same way, the one Being, this Atma, this one is all-cohesive. The light of consciousness and all appearances upon the screen of consciousness, you see.
So the idea of 'me' and 'another' starts to fade away, you see. The idea of separation starts to fade away because we check: where is all of this? Where is all of this? Is it not inside me? All that is being experienced now, where is it being experienced? Is there any other space besides this one space of experiencing? Both the outer and inner are experienced in this one space of Being. So, 'I am the essence of creation.' Verse 7: 'Not seeing Self, the world is materialized. Seeing Self, the world is vanished.' A rope is not a snake, but it can appear to be so. What does it mean, 'not seeing the Self, the world is materialized'? As long as Being doesn't come to the recognition of the Self, it can seem like the world has a fundamental reality. It can seem like this realm is real or it is substantive as long as we are not recognizing who we really are.
And once the Self is seen, it is recognized, then the world is vanished. What does it mean? Does it mean that the world appearance will stop coming? No, the appearance will continue, because even Janaka is speaking these words in the phenomenal realm, isn't it? So the phenomenal appearance continues to appear, but the sense of dependence on it, the sense of reality about it... and what do we mean by unreal? We mean that it is not the truth because it is changing. And we saw in the last few days that the truth is unchanging. Maya is that which is changing. And if you rely on that which is changing to be the truth, what happens to us? We suffer. Every time you have suffered, we have misunderstood something which was changing to be unchanging.
Look at our relationships. We feel like you get into a relationship and it will be the best thing, and we feel like now nothing should change, I should just have it as it is. And then when things are changing, because change is the way of this realm, then we start to suffer. Or sometimes it is also the other way; we want things to change faster than they are, is it? Yeah, you want a partner to change according to who we are. Just the same things as I say this sometimes—just the same things which attracted us to that one, then when we seem to own that one, we want that one to conform to our image. So to expect the unchanging not to change, and to expect this false one will be able to change something in this realm, you see, both are the cause of suffering. The need for this is the resistance to what is. Either we don't want it to change, or we want to change it in a different way or faster than it is changing. This is a resistance to what is, and it is this resistance to what is that is the ego.
Read more (4 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
So this simple allowing, this simple openness which we've been pointing to—it cannot be open and ego at the same time. You cannot be open and suffer at the same time, because this is the true acceptance. It's not that type of egoistic acceptance that we have in relationships sometimes: 'Yes, yes, you're not up to the mark but still I accept you.' It's not that kind of acceptance. It is that acceptance that what is, just is. Allowing this realm to appear as it is appearing. So we find that we find a way to resist everything. I was saying to some of you that we find a way to... sometimes I get some feedback from some of you when you're resisting me. So sometimes you're saying, 'I didn't like this' or 'I don't like how you were.' You know, she said, 'I'm not liking you right now,' is it? And even that, when you just check, even quantitatively, usually it is based on a projection that we have, you see.
So we can resist this life, everything in this life—this teaching, the inquiry, the teacher—basically to go unaccepting of our own Self. We want to make something out of nothing. This attempt to make something out of nothing is the fallacy. 'I will become something. I will become free. I am free now and I'm going to keep it.' All of these ideals which still lead to this idea that I am still something. Can we accept our non-phenomenal reality? That we don't really exist as people, firstly as an ego? And secondly, this phenomenal appearance, it's just like a tiny toenail in terms of the reality of who I am. Can we accept that we are no-thing? And not acceptance mentally, but can we come to terms with our direct recognition of who we are instead of giving that also to the mind to make something out of it?
So we find that here, this no-thing... and the instant we even gave that to the mind, see, the mind will say, 'Yes, that was quite an experience. Maybe reality... we should just aim for these experiences all the time.' And immediately we went to this 'I' again which says that 'I must do something, I must keep this, I have found this.' All of it is a fallacy, you see. There is nobody there. Like we were saying yesterday, there is nobody there. There is nothing there. Nothing there. And I also try to debunk this notion because language can be a very confusing thing. I try to debunk the notion that the no-thing that I am speaking about is the no-thing which is the absence of phenomena, like the empty nothing. The no-thing that you are is this primal knowing, the knowingness, the awareness. I want to say intelligent, but even the word intelligent will not suffice for it. It is beyond intelligence. It is that from which all this comes.
Consciousness is just an aspect of this. What must I be of which consciousness is just an aspect, of which God is just an aspect? And from that aspect comes all of this—like sound, biology, physics, this crazy world of these spinning spheres, a trillion, trillions of planets, these tiny worlds spinning, you see, and expanding. All of this is coming out from an aspect of you. Can you fathom your greatness? You cannot actually. What are you? That you start moving in one direction, you see, in this realm of appearance, you start traveling even at the speed of light, you will not come to the end of the universe. What are you that this is born within you? Unlimited potential for experience, unlimited time, unlimited space. Infinite infinities come from within you. What are you? So it is not that 'nothing' room. There's nothing worth the point. This Satsang is so nihilistic sometimes people start feeling that Advaita is nihilism. Nihilism is just empty and meaningless and dark and gloomy, you know, and we write sad stories about being nothing. It's not this. This is the Purnam, the full nothing. Full of potential and yet not dependent on the potential.
The Thread Continues
These satsangs touch the same silence.

On a similar theme
But... God is Here. - 9th March 2026
9 March 2026
Ananta teaches that God dwells within the heart, hidden only by the 'blanket of me.' He guides seekers to rest in the...

On a similar theme
The Repetition of the God’s Name Has the Power To Cut the Holds of Maya - 4th March 2026
4 March 2026
Ananta emphasizes that God dwells eternally within the temple of the heart, accessible not through conceptual pride or...

The following day
Silent Retreat - Satsang 1, 12th Oct. 2016
12 October 2016