If It Needs Belief, It Is Not True - 4th February 2016
Saar (Essence)
Ananta points to the inherent freedom of Being, urging the dropping of the false sense of doership. He explains that since there is no individual doer, one should simply allow the entire appearance to move without resistance.
If it needs belief, it is not true.
The ego is hanging on to spiritual instruction for dear life... but you already are the Unbound.
Allow everything means including this appearance which we call the body; all actions are just happening on their own.
intimate
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
There's one beautiful video actually in which Guruji says just all you have to do is 3, 2, 1, drop it. See? Just like that. That's it. How to drop it? Just by dropping it. Because if you let the mind come in there and say 'This is too difficult' or 'I don't know how to do it'... yesterday was like that, we had this in Satsang also, and then I had a call with someone after Satsang also. And this sense was there that 'How do I not believe?' The same thing is 'How do I drop it?' And if you let that in, if you don't drop that, then you have to apply some other medicine.
If it is like this, then all I can say is just don't resist anything at all. Allow everything through. No resistance of anything which is arising, including actions coming from our own body. I say like this always because when we hear 'allow everything,' it seems like I'm saying just be passive, allow everything, let the world do anything it wants to you, something like that. The mind builds this kind of story, you see, that I'm proposing some sort of passivity. But what I'm proposing is much deeper than that. I'm saying that there is no doer here anyway. So the allowing means the allowing of everything, the entire appearance.
There is no separation between this body and the rest of the appearance unless we start labeling it. What makes it seem separate is that the sensations which we call coming from our body, they seem to belong to this body and more intimate to us. Actually, this is as much of an appearance as the rest of it. It's not like the hand is something outside of this; it's part of the same appearance. So allow everything means including this appearance which we call the body. And mostly all of you will realize that all these actions happening through the body also just happening on their own.
You can check this now actually. I say, okay, do something. I say, I can do, I move my hand. I can do, I move my hand. See? But the hand moved and the mind came to take credit for that movement. How did the thought move the hand? Who is the 'I' that took the thought and then said, 'Okay, yes, this is what I will do and I did it'? And we know also this, that even scientifically, the thought comes later than actually the nerves start moving, the movement of the hand starts. But even if you presume that there is a decision maker, can we find that one? And then some of you might say, 'But it is the brain that is deciding.' If the brain is deciding, then are you the brain? How do you tell the brain to decide? Cannot find the doer any which way.
Then you say, 'Okay, brain is me actually.' Then leave it to the brain. If the brain already has all the knowledge and knows what to do, then what are you struggling about? This sense of doership, the sense of 'what to do' also creeps into the very primal instructions like 'just stay open, don't believe the next thought.' And it comes and says, 'How do I do that?' But it's not a doing. And if it feels like 'I don't know how to do it,' then forget it. Don't bother yourself up with it. I know many of you struggle with this sense that 'I'm not able to follow the pointing what he's saying.' Don't have to. Forget it. Your being in Satsang is enough. And even that, even if you're not in Satsang actually, ultimately you will see what you are. But my job is to say your being in Satsang is enough.
Read more (3 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
This was required, yeah. Something still moving inside, but something was clear about dropping. It's not... it's just a natural Consciousness movement. It just believes or doesn't believe. And it's not exactly... I still moving here and that caused a lot of like... but it's okay. Like, was given to that see you and I want to become good at it, you see? Yeah.
And this one that wanted to be like too, too heavy... because what is happening is that the ego is hanging on to spiritual instruction for dear life. Now it's let go of all the other things and it now wants to hang on to the pointing in Satsang and say, 'Let's do this together. We can make it. We can be good at it.' And the same sense that 'I can be good at it' is the same as 'I'm unworthy, I'm not good enough.' Just reflecting in different ways. Neither is true. You already are that. You already are free. You cannot be bound. You are the Unbound. And all that is happening is the dropping of that which is false.
A drop in the ocean can believe itself to be just a drop and not the ocean, but can it actually not be the ocean? Is there a separate drop in the first place? The simple pointing is: if it needs belief, it is not true. If you need to believe me, then it is not true. If you're able to check for yourself and see that this is how it is, then that is the direct experience of the truth that we speak about. Whatever movement might be happening in Consciousness, who is witnessing that? And is the witnessing affected by any movement in Consciousness?
The Thread Continues
These satsangs touch the same silence.

On a similar theme
Full Strength Arising Out of Full Innocence - 2nd February 2026
2 February 2026
Ananta emphasizes prioritizing God over worldly social pressures and old conditioning. He encourages devotees to...

On a similar theme
Fearless Abandonment in God - 30th January 2026
30 January 2026
Ananta emphasizes surrendering the ego's need for control and righteousness to the Divine. He teaches that true...

The following day
Attention is Not the Same as Awareness - 5th February 2016
5 February 2016
Ananta guides seekers to recognize the distinction between the seen objects and the Seer. He points toward the...