राम
All Satsangs

Awareness Is Always Neutral - 25th January 2016

January 25, 20167:5940 views

Saar (Essence)

Ananta points to the ever-present neutrality of awareness, which remains an untouched witness regardless of the mind's activity. He explains that while Consciousness may play at being a person, your true nature is the unaffected source.

Awareness is like a car gear always in neutral, unaffected by the traffic of life.
The concept of suffering is only personal; the presence itself cannot suffer.
Even the recognition of the Self doesn't matter to awareness; it is only for Consciousness to stop misidentifying.

contemplative

awarenessconsciousnessegowitnessingidentificationsufferingdoershipneutrality

Transcript

This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.

Ananta

Who feels that there is something left? One something left to be done, something left to be seen, some state yet to be realized? If ego is left, but it is seen that you are not the ego, then it's not ego, you see. Ego means the sense that this that is not me is me. When you see that ego is left, it means you already see it. That means what? That the mind continues to function and sometimes it gets our belief sometimes. But right now when you look, you see ego is left. So you see that if you see it, then you are not it, you see.

Seeker

Sometimes it just feels like this, this lump of energy. It just appears in front of me and I'm actually no way concerned by it. This lump of energy can consist of this body, thoughts, emotions, all of these things. And see, like that, it's just moving on its own. Just like these hands are moving on their own. I'm not saying, 'this hand go like this, this hand go like that.' It's just moving. This talking is just flowing on its own. I'm just watching all of this. This is the same for all of us, and yet this sense of doership, me and mine, gets picked up. Actually, we are just seeing it as the witness of it, just being watched. The seeing—what is the seeing doing? If we were to even forget about the concept of Consciousness for a minute...

Ananta

Yes. So all is just seen appearance. Forget about Consciousness for a minute. There's appearance and there is an awareness of the appearance. What is the awareness doing about anything in the appearance? Just witnessing it. Because even the taste of it is happening for Consciousness. So when I say that forget about Consciousness, it means forget about my dynamic aspect. I as awareness, as this instrument... you just... like what is a good example? Suppose I had a special glove which can participate in some other realm. You, Consciousness, is like that. It's still me, still a part of me, but it's not the entirety of me. It's made up of me, but and yet it is not the entirety of me. Just as what is experienced is just a small aspect of me. This one is feeling, tasting everything that is there in this realm, but the witness of this, that which sees this—what is happening to that? Is it neutral? It's neutral, isn't it?

Seeker

So if this is neutral, then what are we working towards? Can it ever get out of neutral?

Ananta

Suppose it's like the gear in the car. Does it ever come to first or second? It's always in neutral, isn't it? No matter what is happening, what the road conditions are, what traffic is there, whether there are bullock carts like in India sometimes or whether there are speed trains, it's always in neutral, unaffected by any of this.

Read more (4 more paragraphs) ↓
Seeker

So then what are we working to fix? Inability to identify with that?

Ananta

Awareness is you. But does that also affect awareness? It doesn't care. Even that. Even whether the being is identifying as a person or as awareness, awareness is untouched by it. Yes. So that dynamic aspect, my arm... it's like the arm is forgetting what it is and thinks it's a separate arm; actually it is still part of the body. So at the end, then—I know it's defeating the purpose of satsang itself—but ultimately it has to be said that even the recognition of the Self as awareness to awareness doesn't matter. It is only for Consciousness. So Consciousness believing itself to be an entity made up of this matter, or recognizing itself to be the source of itself, to be this awareness itself—that is the only switching that's happening, isn't it? Nothing is happening for the person because the person doesn't exist. Being is going from identifying as this non-existent entity to seeing what it truly is. And for awareness, nothing happened, is it?

Seeker

So if you recognize even for an instant that I am this awareness, then we see that even the play of Consciousness is not relevant for me.

Ananta

Is the... actually, yeah, you can say it is not. For awareness, nothing is happening. Nothing. That's what we're working at. At best, when we are talking from the level of being which has identified itself to be a person using the power of belief, we're working at removing all these misconceptions. But it is not as if even by picking up these beliefs something happened even to Consciousness. See, deeply identified as it might be, it is not suffering from the identification. It's only believing it is suffering. The concept of suffering is only very personal. So once it believes itself to be a person, then it can suffer. How can Consciousness itself suffer? This being... so when I say, 'Can you stop being?' what is found there? This being, the presence. How will we make the presence suffer? Nothing can make the presence suffer.

The Thread Continues

These satsangs touch the same silence.